tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6911830315140428673.post3023284815887803518..comments2024-03-14T21:27:48.439-04:00Comments on Plaintalker II: Some Details on South Second AgreementBernicehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17728257853330372835noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6911830315140428673.post-50690463715351801082015-11-22T11:38:23.548-05:002015-11-22T11:38:23.548-05:00Since the PILOT is both a potentially contentious ...Since the PILOT is both a potentially contentious issue, and a fundamental component, why isn't it dealt with concurrently? Probably because the terms are not advantageous to the City and the 90 days enables the developer to use the defined period as leverage to accept, rather than to abandon the plan. Why aren't the principals identified? Doesn't the public, who theoretically owns the property, have a right to know who is involved? Is the Developer so onerous that his identity would spark public outrage? <br />Bill KruseAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6911830315140428673.post-83151946648688234662015-11-22T11:31:27.614-05:002015-11-22T11:31:27.614-05:00Fear not. Our intrepid counsel members have studie...Fear not. Our intrepid counsel members have studied every line on our behalf.I am confident their decision will reflect the concern they have for their fellow citizens.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com