A Landmark Developers project at 109 East Fourth Street received a use variance and preliminary site plan approval Wednesday after Zoning Board of Adjustment members queried arrangements for parking and handicapped access.
The building takes up its entire lot next to the main train station. Demolishing a one-story structure at the rear will allow for one handicapped parking space and some private open space for the tenants of the proposed eight apartments. Architect Jose Carballo explained that the board's desire for mixed use, with commercial space on the ground floor, was not feasible due to safety concerns, because there is only one entrance at the front.
The board wanted the developer to purchase parking slots in nearby municipal lots, but Carballo said there may be tenants without cars and suggested having tenants purchase parking slots rather than have costs passed on to some who did not need parking.
The parking accommodation has been requested for other downtown projects, even though parking is not required in the downtown.
There will not be any affordable housing in the building, Carballo said in answer to a board member's question.
Landmark, headed by developer Frank Cretella, has nearly a dozen projects in Plainfield in various stages. Each is under a separate limited liability corporation.
--Bernice
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Wednesday, March 6, 2013
Campbell Jr. Seeks Assembly Seat
All those who have been speculating where John Campbell Jr. will land on the political charts can now cross him off the potential mayoral list - he is mounting an Assembly campaign, according to PolitickerNJ. Click here to read the article.
The article states he is targeting Democrat Linda Stender, but actually there are two Assembly representatives in District 22, the other incumbent being Jerry Green. The top two winners get the seats, so even if he campaigns against one, he could displace the other if he gets enough votes.
These Republican forays against entrenched Democrats tend to be sacrificial rather than fair fights, but one never knows.
If this is old news, I apologize. I was without a computer for most of Tuesday and probably missed a lot.
--Bernice
The article states he is targeting Democrat Linda Stender, but actually there are two Assembly representatives in District 22, the other incumbent being Jerry Green. The top two winners get the seats, so even if he campaigns against one, he could displace the other if he gets enough votes.
These Republican forays against entrenched Democrats tend to be sacrificial rather than fair fights, but one never knows.
If this is old news, I apologize. I was without a computer for most of Tuesday and probably missed a lot.
--Bernice
Hear Renowned Professor on Learning Tonight
Educators, parents and others interested in learning should take advantage of an opportunity tonight to hear an expert in a program dedicated to the memory of the late Herb Green, a tireless advocate for education.
The program is sponsored by the Plainfield League of Women Voters, which Green headed as its first male president and then again for a second term in recent years.
See details here:
(Plaintalker will be monitoring the Zoning Board of Adjustment, where the applicants include the new owners of the Armory and developer Frank Cretella, who hopes to convert a former telephone company building next to the main train station to apartments. The meeting is 7 p.m. in City Hall Library.)
The program is sponsored by the Plainfield League of Women Voters, which Green headed as its first male president and then again for a second term in recent years.
See details here:
On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 at 6:30 pm, the League of Women Voters of Plainfield will present its First Annual Herbert Green Forum on Education, with guest speaker Dr. Arnold L. Glass, Professor of Cognitive Psychology at Rutgers University. The talk will take place in the Anne Louise Davis Room at the Plainfield Public Library, located at 800 Park Avenue in Plainfield.
Dr. Glass, whose research focuses on cognitive learning, heads the Learning and Memory Laboratory of the Department of Psychology at Rutgers, and he has published widely in the American Journal of Psychology, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Memory and Cognition, and other professional journals.The Herbert Green Forum on Education is named in memory of our beloved colleague, who died recently at the age of 87 after a brave battle with cancer. This event is free and open to the public, and the League especially encourages educators to attend to hear Dr. Glass's presentation. Refreshments will be served after the talk.
Dr. Glass, whose research focuses on cognitive learning, heads the Learning and Memory Laboratory of the Department of Psychology at Rutgers, and he has published widely in the American Journal of Psychology, The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Memory and Cognition, and other professional journals.The Herbert Green Forum on Education is named in memory of our beloved colleague, who died recently at the age of 87 after a brave battle with cancer. This event is free and open to the public, and the League especially encourages educators to attend to hear Dr. Glass's presentation. Refreshments will be served after the talk.
The League of Women Voters, a non-partisan political organization, encourages the informed and active participation of citizens in government, works to increase understanding of major public policy issues, and influences public policy through education and advocacy. Visit the website at http://plainfieldleague. blogspot.com.
(Plaintalker will be monitoring the Zoning Board of Adjustment, where the applicants include the new owners of the Armory and developer Frank Cretella, who hopes to convert a former telephone company building next to the main train station to apartments. The meeting is 7 p.m. in City Hall Library.)
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
City Owes Condo Fees, Council Not Ready To Approve
The city must pay condo fees for the Senior Center, but Corporation Counsel David Minchello said the question of other costs is moot.
In a discussion Monday, Finance Director Al Restaino said he provided the City Council with excerpts from the master deed for the Senior Center that spell out the city's obligation to pay for maintenance of common areas. When Councilman William Reid questioned whether there was a contract, Minchello said the master deed "acts as a contract."
"We in essence agreed to pay our condo fees," he said.
Councilman Cory Storch recalled some disputed matters in the building's construction, including solar panels and a rooftop garden, and asked whether that affected the fee payment.
"Are we in litigation?" he asked.
Minchello's predecessor, former Corporation Counsel Dan Williamson, had alluded to talks with the developer on other costs before Williamson left in 2012 to become executive director of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority. But Minchello said Monday, "My position is that we do not owe anything above and beyond, but that we are obligated to pay the condo fees."
The city has occupied the center since late 2009 and a prior bill from the developer included back payments of condo fees as well as fit-out costs, but the proposed resolution Monday was just for condo fees in 2013 at the rate of $2,750 monthly. The $33,000 annual fee was proposed for payment earlier this year, but the item was not moved to the agenda for a vote.
Council members questioned the formula Monday for the fee. The center is counted as 13.94 percent of the building, which has three floors of residential condos above and also a small ground-floor portion reserved for a veterans' center. The city will also be liable for condo fees when it takes possession of the veterans' center, which is currently being used by the developer as a sales office for the condos.
Restaino said he would contact the developer regarding the formula for assessment of maintenance costs.
Minchello repeated, there is no pending litigation and no arbitration. His position, he said, is that the city will not arbitrate.
With failure to get a consensus of four members to move the item to the March 11 agenda, it was dropped, at least for March.
--Bernice
In a discussion Monday, Finance Director Al Restaino said he provided the City Council with excerpts from the master deed for the Senior Center that spell out the city's obligation to pay for maintenance of common areas. When Councilman William Reid questioned whether there was a contract, Minchello said the master deed "acts as a contract."
"We in essence agreed to pay our condo fees," he said.
Councilman Cory Storch recalled some disputed matters in the building's construction, including solar panels and a rooftop garden, and asked whether that affected the fee payment.
"Are we in litigation?" he asked.
Minchello's predecessor, former Corporation Counsel Dan Williamson, had alluded to talks with the developer on other costs before Williamson left in 2012 to become executive director of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority. But Minchello said Monday, "My position is that we do not owe anything above and beyond, but that we are obligated to pay the condo fees."
The city has occupied the center since late 2009 and a prior bill from the developer included back payments of condo fees as well as fit-out costs, but the proposed resolution Monday was just for condo fees in 2013 at the rate of $2,750 monthly. The $33,000 annual fee was proposed for payment earlier this year, but the item was not moved to the agenda for a vote.
Council members questioned the formula Monday for the fee. The center is counted as 13.94 percent of the building, which has three floors of residential condos above and also a small ground-floor portion reserved for a veterans' center. The city will also be liable for condo fees when it takes possession of the veterans' center, which is currently being used by the developer as a sales office for the condos.
Restaino said he would contact the developer regarding the formula for assessment of maintenance costs.
Minchello repeated, there is no pending litigation and no arbitration. His position, he said, is that the city will not arbitrate.
With failure to get a consensus of four members to move the item to the March 11 agenda, it was dropped, at least for March.
--Bernice
Blogging Will be Spotty
Dear readers,
I came home last night to find my son had gone on a site that let a virus take over the laptop. I will be using alternate means to blog for a while, so please have patience.
I will be trying to post later about the council meeting. The Dornoch condo fee resolution will not be moved to Monday's regular meeting for a vote. There was also a discussion item regarding issuance of a new club license to serve liquor, but many questions arose. The action needed first is to amend the liquor license ordinance to allow a new club license. Corporation Counsel David Minchello and City Clerk Abubakar Jalloh will research the matter and bring their fndings back to the council. Applicant Dawud Hicks cited his long involvement with youth and sports and said he needs revenues from the club to continue his work.
More later on these topics and other items of interest.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--Bernice
I came home last night to find my son had gone on a site that let a virus take over the laptop. I will be using alternate means to blog for a while, so please have patience.
I will be trying to post later about the council meeting. The Dornoch condo fee resolution will not be moved to Monday's regular meeting for a vote. There was also a discussion item regarding issuance of a new club license to serve liquor, but many questions arose. The action needed first is to amend the liquor license ordinance to allow a new club license. Corporation Counsel David Minchello and City Clerk Abubakar Jalloh will research the matter and bring their fndings back to the council. Applicant Dawud Hicks cited his long involvement with youth and sports and said he needs revenues from the club to continue his work.
More later on these topics and other items of interest.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
--Bernice
Monday, March 4, 2013
On Answering Citizens' Questions
A new feature of City Council meetings this year is that questions from the public are taken down, researched and answered at a subsequent meeting. Plaintalker has a few comments on that process.
First of all, the interval between meetings now that there is only one agenda-fixing and one regular meeting can vary from a week to three weeks. And while there are a few regulars who attend every meeting, research meeting documents at the public library in advance and may even preview topics on blogs, many people come with specific neighborhood issues such as speeding on their block or road conditions. Another segment includes individuals who have longstanding grievances against certain public employees and bring them to the council venue for airing in public and on local television.
So the first group is usually around at subsequent meetings. One hopes the next type of questioner may get contacted after the meeting for more specifics and a phone number for follow-up. The last group may never be satisfied with whatever answer the administration comes up with, short of a public flogging or worse, so we will leave them out of the commentary.
How likely is it that the middle group will return to a subsequent meeting at some time remove from the one where they asked the question? Possible, but not too likely. Those citizens really need a one-on-one response if at all feasible, so they can share it with their neighbors who also suffer the same problem.
The first group, the regulars, probably will be in attendance and perhaps the answers they get will be of general interest. They may be raising policy questions, though sometimes, as in the case of one individual, the goal is mainly to keep up public interest and concern about a single issue, i.e., the lack of a full-service hospital in Plainfield.
At the Feb. 11 regular meeting, Rev. Jason Greer voiced concerns on two topics. One was the proposed concession stand at Joe Black Field, which has been a bone of contention ever since it became known that the $71,000 pre-fab concrete structure would require additional preparation and installation costs that would drive up the total to nearly $200,000. Greer was objecting to Councilman William Reid's notion that a lunch truck could have served just as well. Reid is a tenacious arguer when he wants to contradict something and voted "no" on the resolution after speaking at length about alternatives.
Greer was not exactly tilting at windmills, but at this late juncture, no matter how the purchase of the stand came about, the city was apparently obligated to concede on the ancillary costs, as witnessed by the "yes" votes of the other six council members.
Greer was also perturbed by the hiring of a new, non-resident tax collector who was also given the title of tax search officer.
His concern was such that Plaintalker sought to reassure him after the meeting that the person named knew the city well and had previously served here in the same role. The second title was not a whole extra job, but a statutory title for a specific function.
Greer had worried that the candidate might not be "pro-city" and would have "too much power" with two titles and as a non-resident would not show enough interest in the city.
The issue of non-residency had been a hot one up until 2006, when top posts all went to individuals who were granted waivers of residency. The requirement for a non-resident city employee to move here within a specified time, with exceptions for public safety staff, is still on the books, but waivers have been granted to those with highest salaries and greatest responsibilities ever since it became a non-issue in 2006.
This explanation was not meant to condone the practice, but simply to point out it had become the rule rather than the exception and the new guy was not getting any speical advantage.
Anyway, I hoped a few words of explanation from my long view of city government might prevent Rev. Greer from going away thinking somebody was pulling a fast one on the citizens in this case.
Tonight, three weeks later, if Rev. Greer is present, he can hear the official response.
First of all, the interval between meetings now that there is only one agenda-fixing and one regular meeting can vary from a week to three weeks. And while there are a few regulars who attend every meeting, research meeting documents at the public library in advance and may even preview topics on blogs, many people come with specific neighborhood issues such as speeding on their block or road conditions. Another segment includes individuals who have longstanding grievances against certain public employees and bring them to the council venue for airing in public and on local television.
So the first group is usually around at subsequent meetings. One hopes the next type of questioner may get contacted after the meeting for more specifics and a phone number for follow-up. The last group may never be satisfied with whatever answer the administration comes up with, short of a public flogging or worse, so we will leave them out of the commentary.
How likely is it that the middle group will return to a subsequent meeting at some time remove from the one where they asked the question? Possible, but not too likely. Those citizens really need a one-on-one response if at all feasible, so they can share it with their neighbors who also suffer the same problem.
The first group, the regulars, probably will be in attendance and perhaps the answers they get will be of general interest. They may be raising policy questions, though sometimes, as in the case of one individual, the goal is mainly to keep up public interest and concern about a single issue, i.e., the lack of a full-service hospital in Plainfield.
At the Feb. 11 regular meeting, Rev. Jason Greer voiced concerns on two topics. One was the proposed concession stand at Joe Black Field, which has been a bone of contention ever since it became known that the $71,000 pre-fab concrete structure would require additional preparation and installation costs that would drive up the total to nearly $200,000. Greer was objecting to Councilman William Reid's notion that a lunch truck could have served just as well. Reid is a tenacious arguer when he wants to contradict something and voted "no" on the resolution after speaking at length about alternatives.
Greer was not exactly tilting at windmills, but at this late juncture, no matter how the purchase of the stand came about, the city was apparently obligated to concede on the ancillary costs, as witnessed by the "yes" votes of the other six council members.
Greer was also perturbed by the hiring of a new, non-resident tax collector who was also given the title of tax search officer.
His concern was such that Plaintalker sought to reassure him after the meeting that the person named knew the city well and had previously served here in the same role. The second title was not a whole extra job, but a statutory title for a specific function.
Greer had worried that the candidate might not be "pro-city" and would have "too much power" with two titles and as a non-resident would not show enough interest in the city.
The issue of non-residency had been a hot one up until 2006, when top posts all went to individuals who were granted waivers of residency. The requirement for a non-resident city employee to move here within a specified time, with exceptions for public safety staff, is still on the books, but waivers have been granted to those with highest salaries and greatest responsibilities ever since it became a non-issue in 2006.
This explanation was not meant to condone the practice, but simply to point out it had become the rule rather than the exception and the new guy was not getting any speical advantage.
Anyway, I hoped a few words of explanation from my long view of city government might prevent Rev. Greer from going away thinking somebody was pulling a fast one on the citizens in this case.
Tonight, three weeks later, if Rev. Greer is present, he can hear the official response.
Sunday, March 3, 2013
Council Mulls Senior Center Condo Fees Monday
In 2009, the projected sales price shifted from $300,000 to $199,000.
Monday's City Council agenda includes consideration of a $33,000 annual condo fee for the Senior Center that is part of The Monarch condo development.
The fee for upkeep of common areas is $2,750 per month for the Senior Center, and if the Veterans Center ever gets turned over to the city, there will be an additional fee for that space, which is also a condo. The 63 2-bedroom, 2-bath residential units on the upper three floors are each assessed a monthly maintenance fee of $265, plus a water and sewer assessment fee of $21.17.
The matter of condo fees was on the January agenda-fixing list for discussion, but never got moved to the regular meeting for a vote.
Meanwhile, with only about one-third of the residential units sold since 2009, the company is offering lease-to-purchase plans for renters. The price for the residential units has also dropped by about one-third or more since The Monarch's inception.
Still unresolved is an arrearage of costs for condo fees and fit-out of the space, or at least there has been no public announcement of a settlement.
It would be of interest to know whether the issue has been negotiated successfully. In addition, the full cost of operating the center should be disclosed, including utilities. When the center was a tenant at 305 East Front Street, the building owner was responsible for electricity use and air conditioning, but as a condo owner, the city probably is liable for such costs at the center.
The agenda-fixing session is 7:30 p.m. in Municipal Court, 325 Watchung Ave. Click here to view the entire agenda.
Monday's City Council agenda includes consideration of a $33,000 annual condo fee for the Senior Center that is part of The Monarch condo development.
The fee for upkeep of common areas is $2,750 per month for the Senior Center, and if the Veterans Center ever gets turned over to the city, there will be an additional fee for that space, which is also a condo. The 63 2-bedroom, 2-bath residential units on the upper three floors are each assessed a monthly maintenance fee of $265, plus a water and sewer assessment fee of $21.17.
The matter of condo fees was on the January agenda-fixing list for discussion, but never got moved to the regular meeting for a vote.
Meanwhile, with only about one-third of the residential units sold since 2009, the company is offering lease-to-purchase plans for renters. The price for the residential units has also dropped by about one-third or more since The Monarch's inception.
Still unresolved is an arrearage of costs for condo fees and fit-out of the space, or at least there has been no public announcement of a settlement.
It would be of interest to know whether the issue has been negotiated successfully. In addition, the full cost of operating the center should be disclosed, including utilities. When the center was a tenant at 305 East Front Street, the building owner was responsible for electricity use and air conditioning, but as a condo owner, the city probably is liable for such costs at the center.
The agenda-fixing session is 7:30 p.m. in Municipal Court, 325 Watchung Ave. Click here to view the entire agenda.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)


