Monday, May 24, 2010

Walkability vs. Danger

Random image: White Star of Bethlehem.

Today's Courier News has a brief article about yet another possibly gang-related shooting, the seventh in about two weeks.

Within that time span, I walked to and from the NAACP forum at Whitney Allen Young Apartments on Central Avenue, just six blocks from where I live near Park & Seventh. Later, a trusted friend told me he would have advised me to get a ride or stay home, had he known I was walking, because of the shootings which had begun by that time. I passed by the periphery of the neighborhood where the apparent gang dispute broke out.

Recently I walked even further, to a Board of Education meeting at Washington School. This school was built as a community center and many public events take place there.

But officials even express concern when they find out I walk the half-block or so to City Hall or the five short blocks to Municipal Court, in order to cover City Council or other public meetings.

All these neighborhoods have residents. Granted, I am a stranger to some. But within these neighborhoods, those who live there must run errands, wait at bus stops, go to schools and in other ways expose themselves to random danger. What will it take to reduce or remove this factor from the daily lives of individuals who have nothing to do with gangs?

So far this time around, only those suspected to be gang members have suffered harm, and true to their code, they aren't talking to police about what happened. But in the past, innocent bystanders have been harmed or killed. (Personally, I don't think going to these destinations in a car gives an individual much more protection from gang violence than being on foot.)

There is a tendency (expressed in fact at the NAACP meeting) to blame news media and bloggers for "negativity," including reports of shootings and gang violence. One candidate at the forum suggested that the cure was for the city to have its own newspaper. But pretending these crimes don't exist won't make them go away.

Walkability - meaning access on foot to stores, transit, restaurants, schools and libraries, personal service providers, parks and more - is a key factor in attracting people to urban centers. If walking is equated with danger, the community loses its appeal and even its viability as a place to live. Those with the means to pick up and relocate or avoid living there in the first place will do so.

Plainfield deserves the benefit of best practices and strategies to rid the city of gang activity. Gang members intent on destroying each other must not be allowed to overlay their violence on the lives of everyday people (or even bloggers).

--Bernice Paglia

12 comments:

  1. Bernice, you can always hitch a ride with this irresponsible 90 year old driver. I am intending to address the subject of your post either tomorrow or Wednesday (plug). I rfeferred to it obliquely in my blog on the "Vision Study" pointing out why it is doomed to failure under present conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. You hit the nail on the head. Just ask ANY senior if they walk around past noon in their neighborhood. It is always the plan to get chores done before the rif-raff start hanging around. The council and mayor are big on healthy life styles, ask them how many times they have walked to city hall, board of ed, post offcie or muhlenberg ?????

    ReplyDelete
  3. Where are the beat cops? Being visible, I believe, is a deterrent. Even if I am in Westfield for 3 minutes, I see a police officer. I think we should start having them walk the streets, and get in their cars and drive instead of hanging out at Police hqrtrs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Beat cops what a boob there sre no beat cops there to busy dealing with all the other crap in this city and being that there is no Chief they have to be stationed at Political functions and whatever the politicains want them to enforce.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Bernice,
    You are exactly right. A safe walking environment is the first step to economic development in Plainfield, and the administration's suppression of news about the safety of Plainfield's streets does the public a grave disservice. Redeployment of police from other duties to walking the beat would be very helpful. Possible candidates for redeployment are the police officers guarding our public officials such as our mayor. Also, some of the several officers who are routinely stationed at the Monarch's Senior Citizens Center could be used. It could be done, at least on a limited scale, with no new cost to the city.
    Jim Pivnichny

    ReplyDelete
  6. Might I remind you Bernice...by talking about the obvious things such as crime and gang activity you are in fact part of the problem. I think the head in the sand approach like Mayor Sharon advocates is the way to go. I mean...if you don't have a problem with one of your staff members visiting a prostitute, I mean, MASSAGE THERAPIST on city time how can supposed "gang" violence be an issue ? I read my comment before posting :o)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Rob, I am torn between deleting your comment and actually finding out what really happened when the Suburban went to West Caldwell. We may never know, but it certainly remains a distraction.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you for this posting. You are correct, turning a BLIND EYE to the problem won't make it go away. That's the mentality of a 4 year old. --> If I close my eyes it will go away.

    The council and administration need to come up with a viable plan. Too many people in the city administration are too focused on their own well-being that they aren't governing effectively.

    I won't sign my name so I'm not accused by the administration of assisting the "bloggers". :)

    ReplyDelete
  9. reply to Jim
    You should know that there are no more security officer for the mayor One was charged for stealing money from the PBa and was terminated. The other one is well lets not go there. The officers assigned to the Monarch are the COP officers working downtown and thatis there office. Please get the facts before you comment thats why you lost the election

    ReplyDelete
  10. I can see your point Bernice. But that "classified" was hardly from the back of the Courier News. It may have not been the corner of Broadway and 42nd from the mid-70's for blatant and obvious for "what it was", but that listing was no garden tea party invitation. I think more than anything, especially with the current administration in Plainfield...Silence speaks volumes. He and the Mayor could clear it up EASILY were there some, say..."misunderstanding". They won't or can't. Either one is not exactly encouraging for the people of Plainfield's lead crime fighter.

    ReplyDelete
  11. You are absolutely correct that walking equals exposure, which dramatically increases the risk of danger, not just from gangs, but also from random or petty violence, or from just plain street creepiness. You are also correct that until street safety is felt by the community no amount of ribbon-cutting boosterism will matter in Plainfield's downtown revival.

    But who will champion that feeling, and who will even know if it arrives? I don't think anyone will ever become the forceful full-time advocate because nobody in power walks. Does our assemblyman or mayor walk home from work at night? Public safety director? Council president? Council members? Corporation counsel? Admin director? I don't think so.

    Plainfield has a split personality: part drive-oriented suburb, part walking urban center. I think the suburb part is reasonably well understood by those who control the mechanisms of change, but I'm not at all sure about the urban part.

    ReplyDelete
  12. From Stephen Kilduff:
    You are absolutely correct that walking equals exposure, which dramatically increases the risk of danger, not just from gangs, but also from random or petty violence, or from just plain street creepiness. You are also correct that until street safety is felt by the community no amount of ribbon-cutting boosterism will matter in Plainfield's downtown revival.

    But who will champion that feeling, and who will even know if it arrives? I don't think anyone will ever become the forceful full-time advocate because nobody in power walks. Does our assemblyman or mayor walk home from work at night? Public safety director? Council president? Council members? Corporation counsel? Admin director? I don't think so.

    Plainfield has a split personality: part drive-oriented suburb, part walking urban center. I think the suburb part is reasonably well understood by those who control the mechanisms of change, but I'm not at all sure about the urban part.

    ReplyDelete