Sunday, November 23, 2014

All City Unions Due for Contract Settlement

Contracts for all seven city bargaining units should be in place by mid-December and will cover all four years of Mayor Adrian O. Mapp's term.

Salary increases must be passed by ordinance on two readings. Final passage on an increase for members of the Plainfield Municipal Management Association took place Nov. 10 and six other contracts passed on first reading, with final passage expected on Dec. 8. The bargaining units as listed on the Nov. 10 agenda are the Plainfield Municipal Employees Association, the Plainfield Fire Officers Association, the Fire Mutual Benevolent Association, the Policemen's Benevolent Association Local 19 (officers and rank & file) and United Service Workers Union Local 255. Increases for all are 1.5 percent annually for 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017.

Over the years,  some unions have worked for years without a contract. It seemed unusual to have all contracts settled and Plaintalker asked Mayor Adrian O. Mapp about it.

"First, let me say how pleased I am that we have been able to work in good faith with all of our bargaining units to come up with new collective negotiation agreements," Mapp said. "Our goal was to have all of the agreements settled before the end of my first year in office and to have them in place for a full 4 years to run concurrent with my term. I don’t recall this ever being done."

Mapp cited a spirit of cooperation between the administration and the bargaining units.

"The team was very focused, candid and honest in its approach and gained the trust of the various bargaining units who all wanted to reach agreements that were reasonable and fair, during the very challenging economic times that we face as a City. The success of these negotiations is unprecedented and speaks to the spirit of cooperation that exists between my Administration and our Unions. Fairness, cooperation, professionalism and respect were the determining factors," he said in an email response to our query.

The city also has a roster of non-union employees that used to get raises after all the union contracts were settled. The list includes department heads, the city administrator, the police director, the city clerk, the chief financial officer, the fire chief, the personnel director and several other titles. Raises for those employees used to be passed by ordinance as well, but in recent years that has not been the case. In 2006, only the chief financial officer and the city clerk received raises by ordinance, retroactive for four years. The title of police chief was abolished in 2008 and replaced by the title of police director. However, no salary band was set for police director until 2010.

Plaintalker reported on the increasing disparity in compensation for cabinet titles in 2009. One of the concerns was the ability to attract top staff in the future with such disparity. The list of non-represented officials also changed, as indicated by past responses to Plaintalker's OPRA requests. Perhaps the most curious situation among the non-union employees was having a department head (Public Affairs & Safety) over a police director. In the last administration, Martin Hellwig held both titles, in effect reporting to himself. He received only one salary but also had pension income from Essex County.

Plaintalker will be looking into the non-union contract situation in coming weeks.

Besides settling contracts, another item that can affect the city budget is the amount owed to employees for unused sick and vacation days. The state requires municipalities to declare the amount in budget statements, along with any funds set aside to help meet the liability. Plaintalker wrote about "The Big I.O.U." in 2008, when the so-called Compensated Absence Liability was around $4.9 million for 17,661 days and nothing was set aside for payouts. In 2014, the liability is down by 29 percent to $3.4 million for 12,950 days and $200,000 is in reserve. It is still a lot compared to municipalities that don't allow accumulation of sick and vacation days, but at least it is trending downward.

--Bernice

14 comments:

  1. Pmua garbage men still getting the shaft how come they not part municipal union?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Because PMUA is about giving the shaft to everyone in the city, and our elected politicians who are supposed to provide a degree of accountability are either spineless or have some past or present personal tie to its bag of tricks.

      Delete
    2. The PMUA is an independent authority. The mayor and council may approve PMUA commissioners who set policy for the operations of PMUA. I believe the workers want a union but I don't know the status.

      Delete
  2. Once again Mayor Mapp has done something positive to straighten out the mess he inherited. Congratulations to all!

    ReplyDelete
  3. The PMUA garbage men , yard workers and sewer maintenance crews are the heart of the organization. They deserve a fair shake. These essential people comprise about 1/2 of the PMUA organization. It is the other half, the "Administrative " staff that has enlarged to unnecessary proportions. Please remember that the study conducted by a committee appointed each of the City Council members unanimously reported that the PMUA rates were a cool 250% higher than two neighboring communities with comparable
    populations.
    This enormous disparity can not be attributed exclusively to our older sewer system which requires more costly maintenance.
    In reviewing PMUA records in their offices 3 years ago I observed extraordinary payments to no les than 4 law firms, 4 real estate consultants, and of course the usual retinue of Accountants, Auditors, Engineers, and the ever present in house out of house attorney etc. Admittedly some portion of these costs are necessary. An independent contractor performing the same scope, say about $12,00.000/year in solid waste collection, would have one part time accountant ,and one on call attorney who would be paid per hour when and if needed. The billing and collection, P&L and General Ledger on Quick Books all administered by one competent lady ( or gentlemen ) in the office. A second office worker would administer accounts payable and payroll which might be handled by a payroll service. The office staff of 2 people would answer the phone, field complaints, write the correspondence, perform general administration and make the coffee.. If you think I am exaggerating make it 3 people. Certainly not 50 or more.
    Because the PMUA is a Municipal Agency it is burdened with administrative costs resulting from reports, some inflicted by external Agencies, and some the products of the internal bureaucracy with which an independent contractor would never be involved..

    As part of the struggle to "MAINTAIN: the rates, forget rREDUCING the rates, they disabuse their only asset, the good guys that turn out on subzero mornings and in blizzards to perform the work . It is no wonder that the PMUA distorts the proportion between the Shared Service fee and the Household collection fee( another entire subject)
    Bill Kruse

    ReplyDelete
  4. ...and still the Plainfield school teachers have no contract for the last three school years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aren't they under the Campbell's and Jerry Green?

      Makes a statement, doesn't it.?

      Delete
  5. Bernice, Before commenting on these union contract raises which will be 1.5% per year, something else needs to be known. Is there an additional automatic cost of living adjustment (COLA) attached to them that may result in wages increasing more than 1.5% per year? Could you get that answer?

    The point is that while a 1.5% increase plus COLA is better than in the past, it is out of line with the unfortunate reality that most salaries are decreasing after adjustment for the cost of living. That would be unfair and unsustainable.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. These raises are all described as "negotiated COLA raises," so they are the cost of living raises. I think that's it. The municipal budget is not allowed to increase by more than 2 percent by state law.

      Delete
    2. That's great if that is it:)

      Delete
  6. The Democratic Party which brought the PMUA to the City, is still LOVED by the voters. So why would the Democratic Party do anything differently ?? Their people are making big $$$ as consultants and staff.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Mark Fury was mayor when the PMUA was established by the council. And it was Al McWilliams who cast the deciding vote. When criticized about that, he said it was a "done deal" although he may have meant a different way of spelling "done."

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thank you, Mayor Mapp, for once again showing the citizens of Plainfield what good leadership and vision can do. This is something we have not had for many years.

    Despite the lack of cooperation with the Council because of self serving politics, you have shown in one short year, that it doesn't take a lifetime to bring about positive change to a city that has this kind of potential. And, while having a cooperative council would be nice, it isn't necessary. Especially if the council's only motive is the twart the growth of Plainfield.

    And Jerry Green is proud of what he has done for Plainfield in 25 years, and people keep electing him. Makes you really wonder.

    Thank you again, Mayor Mapp. What do you have in store for us next year?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hellwig reported to himself. AHH that explains a lot

    ReplyDelete