Friday, July 13, 2012

Tighten Up Fiscal Controls

Image: www.thepinkflamingosite.com
Way back in April, Councilman William Reid and resident Alex Toliver launched plans for an expanded parade to welcome returning veterans. Reid announced that he and Toliver had voluntarily purchased lawn sgns, bumper stickers and "badges" to publicize the event.

But at the July 8 agenda-fixing session, Reid mentioned the purchases again in the context of being under the bid threshhold, apparently meaning the pair will seek reimbursement from the city for the paraphernalia. So what's wrong with that? In Plaintalker's opinion, it is a prime example of the laissez-faire attitude toward spending that has come to the fore in the absence of normal fiscal controls.

The last city audit report had 40 recommendations, the first of which was that all city purchases should be made through the purchasing agent. The "corrective action" for the problem included receipt of a purchase order prior to delivery of goods. The report said the recommendations had been completed, "however it is acknowledged that consistent monitoring will ensure ongoing compliance." In other words, if somebody didn't remind folks of the rules, people would go out and spend money as they wished and then expect to be reimbursed.

As previously reported, the new all-Plainfield Independence Day Committee - established after other municipalities dropped out of sponsorship of the event - never received any members. An ad hoc group makes all the decisions on the event, which this year included a parade, car show, concert and fireworks. Councilwoman Rebecca Williams is now leading the charge to get details on the scope of spending for the event, including whether outside agencies or individuals collected unauthorized fees.

The issues made this writer think of a hypothetical example in which a citizen or group of citizens decides to "brand" the city and generate some publicity through the use of, say, pink flamingos. This could be based just on whimsy and fun or maybe on the city's gay-friendly atmosphere that, during the 1980s, attracted a large number of Manhattanites who fell in love with Plainfield's housing stock and played a large role in restoring many of its mansions. In some cities, a running joke is to fill somebody's yard with pink flamingos and to declare, "You've been flocked!" Sometimes it is celebratory, sometimes it is a fundraiser for some local charity.

At any rate, a yardful of pink flamingos creates a buzz and produces publicity and laughs.

So what if this became a successful Queen City phenomenon and after the fact these hypothetical citizens decided to bill the city for the purchase of 100 pink flamingos?

The point here is not to demean any other cause, such as welcoming veterans, but to say there is a right way and a wrong way to try to spend public money.

Unfortunately, when Audit & Control is lacking key staff, lapses may occur.

At the July 9 council meeting, there was a discussion of how to strengthen the fiscal team by having both a full-time chief financial officer and a full-time treasurer in that office. Currently, there is neither, nor is there a permanent purchasing agent. So the thought is there, it is just the execution that is lacking. The sooner the reality matches the intent, the better, when it comes to fiscal controls. As a taxpayer, do you agree?

--Bernice

15 comments:

  1. Oh no Bernice.. That wouldn't be right!
    You have to first become "BETTER THAN EVERYONE ELSE" by being elected... Then, you get to remind the "stupid people" how lucky they are to have you grace their presence.
    Then you get to spend the taxpayers money like a drunk sailor in a whore house and point the finger of blame at everyone else.
    Why...without Bill Reid.. LORD KNOWS HOW MUCH WORSE IT COULD REALLY GET !!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mr Reid, and Mr Toliver's behavior is so very wrong. Realize that other municipalities, would squash behavior like this, before it began. Playing fast and loose, with my money, that is to say taxpayer money, is self serving, and uncalled for. If all of the trappings included in this parade were a wonderful idea, why did no other town, or group of towns agree?

    Seems as if money grows on tress around here, or at least that's the impression one might get. Nonsense prevails...

    ReplyDelete
  3. Plainfield Housing Authority commissioner Hattie Williams had PHA cut a check for a Tracey Brown for Council fundraiser. I'm told she intended to reimburse them anyway, a political contribution from a public agency obviously being prohibited, and the money has since been returned when the 'temporary' trangression was noted. But why would you involve PHA in the first place if this was supposed to be a personal contribution all along? Is the administration getting into the microloan business?

    She may also still be on Jerry Green's Democratic City Committee. But, whatever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I teach accounting and see how this administration and others totally ignore what are call "GAAP" (generally accepted accounting principle). If this city followed good accouning practices we would not be in the deep hole we are currently in. Reid and Toliver should know better. Don't say you're going to volunteer services or goods and then back out. Anyone can see that they may have done this to get brownie points. We need to make sure our city is doing things in a responsible way. We won't get it from this mayor, so we may need to force the issue.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Let's get to the real bottom of this. If we are going to do a audit on the recreation department then let's go back as far as The late Mayor McWilliams. He paid a women $10,000.00 to $15,000.00 dollars to do the july 4th parade in 2003. This women worked in the same real estate office as his wife. The parade was a complete disaster that year. do your research. Come on people let's get to the bottom of the truth. If thats what we really want to do.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Yes I remember that also. I don't remember if it was 2002 or 2003, but I do know that this young lady was paid $10,000.00 to do the parade

    We had a parade committee that I sat on and we did our work on a volunteer basis.

    We were very upset, this women got paid as a parade consultant, and we did all the work. The council approved it.

    Thanks for bringing that up. I had forgot all about it.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes let's do the investigation, and let'd get a forensic audit done going back to the Mayor before this Mayor now. I do not support her at all, but I know council member's that have sat on the council with the previous Mayor that have done things that just do not past the smell test.

    There is a council person right now that should be under investigation for the railroad incident that he's hoping that people have forgotten.

    When they are pointing their fingers there are some fingers pointing back at them.

    I will never VOTE for Mayor Robinson-Briggs again, but let's be fair when start talking about investigations.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Instead of constantly complaining, rob, anonymous and anyone else why don't you actively get involved instead of constantly finding fault with those that are involved. Put up or shut up. The same people do nothing but complain and whine, stop talking about it and be about it. If you think you can do better, then I suggest you run for a position and let's see how well you do. Enough said.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow Ms. Paglia I think the entire City Hall needs a foresic audit. Let's start digging, I know there are some serious bones there.

    I am not a supporter of anyone on the council right now, but I have to say if Plainfield wants to get things done right them i am all in.

    Wow $10,000.00 on a parade consultant whats next.

    Renee

    ReplyDelete
  10. Those Republicans were causing back in 2003, I knew it !! Take from the poor and give to the, well I guess it is to the Democratic inner circle, but if they had been on the Council they probably would have done something stupid like asked the South Plainfield High School band to play for free !!

    ReplyDelete
  11. I just spoke to a past councilmen and he informed me that Mayor Al McWilliams did pay a consultant over $10,000.00 to do the July 4th Parade. I was also informed that they had a July 4th committee at the time. Why wasn't that investigated. Plainfield stop picking which incidents you want to unfold. Like Renee said let's unfold them all.

    Bruce

    ReplyDelete
  12. Hi Ms. Paglia on another note do you know if Mrs. Paglia is sick? I miss reading her blog.
    i am concerned about her. I hope she is ok

    Renee

    ReplyDelete
  13. To 12:02 PM, There are so many of us that have tried to get involved for the bettermen of Plainfield, but guess what, if you are not one of the cronies (which you probably are), you are shut down at every turn. Just ask all those that have applied for seats on boards and commissions and were never even considered or never received so much as a no thank you, ask all those that have volunteered to work toward the improvement of this City that were given that phony red lipsticked smile, an oh sure honey and dismissed.

    ReplyDelete
  14. And the City has a nerve to send me a letter stating that they will not be responsible to pay an invoice if a purchase order was not recieved first. Well, try not to pay a bill for something that was ordered by a city employee and see who wins. Stop trying to pass the buck on to vendors and make your own staff more fiscally responsible.

    ReplyDelete
  15. IT WAS $20,000.00 PAID TO MAYOR AL MCWILLIAMS WIFE FRIEND TO RUN THE JULY 4TH PARADE. NOT $10,000.00 NOT $15,000.00 BUT $20,000.00 DOLLARS. TO TOP THINGS OFF THERE WAS A COMMITTEE WHOM DID THE ENTIRE PARADE FOR FREE

    ReplyDelete