Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Mayor Miffs, Votes Cause Tiffs

Tuesday's City Council meeting turned fractious more than once and should be a blockbuster episode on the community television channels for its tell-all ending about a mayoral dispute in the West End.

In public comment, residents described a confrontation with the mayor over a weekend carnival that tantalized children who could not afford $35 for rides. Allegedly unresponsive at first, the mayor showed up and had words with parents over the cost, residents said, before she donated tickets. There was a lot more to the tale, so check Channel 96 or 34 for the Oct. 9 meeting.

Before the explosive ending, the council saw two outbursts, one over rejection of a Veterans' Awareness Day event planned for Oct. 14 and another over seniors' objections to naming the Senior Center for a single late member.

"Explain what this is all about," Councilwoman Bridget Rivers said to representatives of the group that had already advertised the veterans' event at Plainwood Square.

Rev. David L. Wyatt said numerous businesses had agreed to take part in the event meant to raise awareness of needs for housing and assistance for veterans and anyone unable to "do for self." But Councilwoman Rebecca Williams noted the city had just dedicated the July Fourth parade to veterans and they would also be honored on Veterans Day in November. Marianne David, executive director of Transitions International, said the group chose the October date because of the weather. David said it was "still in the vicinity" of Veterans Day, but by November, "We don't know whether it is going to snow."

The group planned to have performers, speakers and vendors Sunday, but Williams said organizers should have come to the council long before "four days before the event."

Council President Adrian Mapp expressed concern over closing South Avenue for the event, which brought bakery owner Lew Demeter to the microphone to say the district lost thousands of dollars while the street was closed for repairs, and not one council member came to his business. He said the street would not be closed, but the group had been advised by the City Clerk's office to use Plainwood Square park instead of his parking lot for the event.

"Now you're throwing a monkey wrench in this," Demeter said angrily.

City Clerk Abubakar Jalloh said the council was only being asked to approve use of the park, but the vote failed, 3-3-1, with Vera Greaves, William Reid and Bridget Rivers voting "yes," Annie McWilliams, Cory Storch and Williams abstaining and Mapp voting "no."

In another controversy, Senior Center members objected to a resolution naming the center for Charles Louis Nelson, who led the group's building committee through planning for a new center at 400 East Front Street. Nelson passed away just before the new center opened.

Center President Mazie Wormley told the council that members preferred not to name the center for just one person, but to have a "tree of life" honoring the many "heroes and sheroes" who worked on getting a new center. Center official George Gore also said the members did not want the center named for anyone.Correction: Gore suggested the "tree of life."

"Table it and go talk to the seniors, or don't approve it at all," Gore said.

Resident Dottie Gutenkauf added her objections, saying to single out one person was "a disservice to all."

 But when it came to a vote, council members agreed to amend the resolution to have a plaque with names of all the building committee members and others, but still to name the center for Nelson.

Gore stood up and shouted that there would be a petition against the move, adding, "You want to play politics? I'll show you how to play politics."

Gore stormed out before the vote on the amended resolution, which passed 5-2. McWilliams, Rivers, Storch, Williams and Mapp voted "yes" and Greaves and Reid voted "no."

Plaintalker will report on other council topics later.

--Bernice

12 comments:

  1. I'm glad Shady Sharonda didn't get away with murder and wonder who she didn't advise the vetran's people that they needed to get approval for any city property use well ahead of advertising. Are these people stupid or what?

    Naming the Veteran's Center for one person is foolish at least. Why does everything need to be named for someone? There are other ways to honor people. Our City Council needs to listen to those involved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. A bunch of crooks I say from the mayor to her cabinet and anyone who would advertise any program without getting it approved. That says to me that they figured they would get what they wanted (Burger King) mentality, and where has rev. david wyatt been (no caps on purpose) lately. He haven't been seen since the year they raised the money for a community center, by the way what happened to that and where did the money they collected that Saturday afternoon go anyway? I'd like to know and investigate that. The mayor was a speaker and a lot of folks donated money. Let's drop the titles and call a spade a spade. I don't trust any of them and maybe on a better day but I'm just tired of all the dishonesty in this city, that used to be the Queen City a place that brought people from towns around. Let's put people in place that will try and bring that Plainfield back.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I wholeheartedly support naming the senior center after the late Mr. Nelson. He was instrumental through at least TWO mayoral administrations in getting the center built--a posthumous naming is fitting and proper, as council president said. The plaque, with the names of the other members of the center's building committee (going back to the 1990s) will fittingly honor their contributions as well.

    If the naming of a senior center (the council's prerogative) after a revered, courageous, an tenacious individual such as Mr. Nelson was is an issue over which residents want to get "political," God help the city of Plainfield.

    There are more substantive issues that our city's seniors should be more vocal about at our meetings--such as the mayor and her administration not adhering to "best practices," which is costing us to lose state aid--which affects property taxes, or the fraud which occurred in the Rec Division, or the mayor's breaking of state law in the WBLS event, which cost the city upwards of $60,000 thus far.

    There was nothing political in the council's decision to honor Mr. Nelson--it is simply the right thing to do, in my humble opinion. I think that Mr. Nelson's family and Senior Center friends are deeply moved and honored by the council's actions.

    Rebecca

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree that the Seniors Center
      should be name after the late Charles Nelson. I'll be at the next city council
      meeting.
      Reggie Garner






      Delete
  4. Reid and Greaves are tiring. They know nothing about what they are doing. They represent no one other than themselves and the mayor. They do nothing but be contrary.

    Well wards 1 & 4 is this what you voted for, or didn't you vote, and this is what you are stuck with? Hopefully it's the latter, and you will pay attention and vote them out next time. Otherwise, same-o, same-o.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Are we the taxpayers paying for the carnival tickets too?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Don't hold your breath waiting to see this circus played on plainfield's community access channel. There hasn't been a council meeting aired since at least april of this year. I have been waiting to see the one where I hear Dave Wynn made an "ass" of himself and that has yet to be broadcast. Maybe someone could look into that and find out why no meeting have been shown for such a long period of time. Maybe someone doesn't want the outside world to see what a joke this leadership really is and how low they will sink to hold onto their huge, unwarranted large salaries with their do nothing attitudes for doing their jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Please, please .... please never name anything after the taxpayers who actually paid for all this stuff around town.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Exactly Linda. The TV station runs a slide show over and over and over. It's all that is ever on these days. It's an embarrassment equal to City Hall.

    ReplyDelete
  9. We pay for this carnival on a daily basis through our tax dollars, I wish the ride just cost $35! The administration and, board of education and most of the so-called leadership in Plainfield is nothing more than a three ring circus with a bunch of clowns running the show.

    Although I feel for the organization interested in holding an event this coming weekend, they should've known better and prepared accordingly and on a timely basis.

    It seems that Robinson-Briggs was affiliated with this event and it's very possible she misguided the organization into thinking they could move forward with promoting the event prior to getting the "green light" from the council. Let's not blame the Council for this.

    The event sounded like much more than just a veterans' event -- and it sounded as though they could've organized this event at a church or similar type venue in the city; as explained, the event sounded like part fund-raiser and the other part, well, I'm not sure, and I don't think anyone else was.

    I hope that they will follow through and consider holding their event some time in the future and be able to plan accordingly.

    I did not understand why Mr. Demeter was so upset with the council about getting the road re-paved. I'm sure he experienced loss of business, but the job needed to get done and things look a lot better. Let's move on, that's all we can do. There's no sense in revisiting the past -- something folks do here a lot! Let's move forward folks......

    ReplyDelete
  10. So the rules for holding an event were in a nutshell haphazardly thrown to the side with an expectation of it passing simply out of : IT'S ABOUT TO HAPPEN.
    Good... glad it didn't. Just because the City of Plainfield has been operating by the seat of it's pants for years, doesn't mean everything should.
    If more times the rule of law were followed the city would be in a better state...whether that be the hot mess of a Mayor or the spineless fractured city council that seems to be only accomplish "oh...what are we supposed to do" hang wringing.
    The Senior Center...it's been a joke since it's inception so for anyone to talk about what's "inappropriate" is laughable. Everyone of those seniors who wears red should be throw out the door for simply being patsies to the Mayor. If they're all that short sighted to ignore they've been used or are actively being used... SHUT IT DOWN and sell or lease the condo. That center should not be the least bit involved in politics in this city.
    Per the name... Name it after the Mayor.. They play butt puppy to her blatant political pandering enough they deserve to wear the shame of her name for the next few decades.

    ReplyDelete