Friday, March 15, 2013

Burney, Fury Give Charter Views

Plaintalker is tempted to advise readers to wait for the minutes of Thursday's Charter Study Commission meeting, at which former Mayor Mark Fury gave a bravura performance, blending history, personal anecdotes and allusions to secret opinions in his answers to 22 questions. But maybe some aspects can be reported.

Fury called Plainfield "a unique place" and "the center of the universe" even as he recounted the many shifts in its demographics and fortunes since he grew up here. He wove in tales of African-Americans' and other ethnicities' migrations to the city for jobs at Mack Trucks and linked the plant closing to dissatisfaction and economic loss that set the stage for the 1967 upheaval, calling Plainfield "the smallest city to have a race riot before it was cool."

As mayor, he said, "I quit a $100,000 job to take a $10,000 job," but said he had a responsive council and nothing in the charter hindered him from "reshaping government," referring to his reallocation of several divisions under the three mandated departments.

Fury led an earlier Charter Study Review Committee that he said he "used as a platform to become mayor." He said he met with former Corporation Counsel Dan Williamson on Wednesday, telling him he owed Williamson and former Mayor Harold Mitchell an apology, because he thought they "were the problem," but he did not explain the comment further.

At one point, he raised his voice and growled a complaint that he wasn't allowed to take control of the school system while he was here.

Fury did answer the commission's questions in his own way, but said, "The problems in Plainfield are not in the charter."

Former Councilman Rashid Burney was the first interviewee Thursday and called the study "an exercise that is well due." He said the charter's authors were aiming for "a balance of power," but likened the checks and balances to an anchor that could cause things to "get stuck."

Burney approved of the ward system, saying there must be "representation from all geographical neighborhoods." If all council members were elected at large, he said, they might just come from a single neighborhood.

Saying the role of the council is to make laws, he said it would help to have staff to research legislation, noting his own struggle to look up other municipalities' tree commission ordinances to put one together for Plainfield.

Regarding public safety, he said the city's Fire Division came in number one in comparisons with other municipalities, but it was the opposite for the Police Division. Burney alluded to issues with the role of the police chief, a title that was abolished in 2008.

Burney said he found that the corporation counsel "works for the mayor" and could not also serve the governing body, as stated in the charter. He said there should be separate legal representation for the council.

He also found fault with the charter and municipal code in that he feels the budget process starts too late. He suggested it should be introduced at the end of the previous year, rather than in the first quarter of the budget year.

Burney also said government planning should be outsourced to citizen groups and there should be a full-time mayor whose role would be "to sell the agenda."

The commission will meet next on March 28 and expects to interview former City Clerk Laddie Wyatt and former Corporation Counsel Dan Williamson. On April 11, scheduled interviewees are former Corporation Counsel Rowand Clark, Republican Party Chairwoman Sandy Spector and former City Administrator Hank Kita.

Read minutes and see other details on the Charter Study Commission blog (click here). The answers of previous interviewees are posted in the minutes.

--Bernice

10 comments:

  1. It's funny to read his comments when I think Mark was the beginning of the downfall of leadership in the City of Plainfield.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Bernice, thanks for your thorough reporting (as always). I don't know if it was clear, but I also suggested enacting terms limits for both the Mayor and the Council. If asked, I would say two terms for the Mayor and three for Council.

    The full time Mayor is needed IF we as a community want better schools, lower crime rates and more job opportunities. If we are happy where we are then, yes, we do not need a Mayor and a town council and administrator will be able to maintain status-quo.

    Finally I also advocated for lowering the threshold for referendums and recalls.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mr. Burney did a good job while on council and has some good insights. He did back Sharon more than I would have liked, but did an overall good job. We do need seperate council to represent the mayor and council and term limits aren't a bad thing. Perhaps after two terms in office the mayor would need to sit out one or two terms before running again. The council might have a limit of three or four terms and then need to take a hiatus of one term. I think we need to get rid of the "at large" seats and perhaps one or two people from each ward on the council elected in a staggered way.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Pat Turner KavanaughMarch 15, 2013 at 11:27 AM

    Bernice: Rashid has been in the trenches of City government warfare in Plainfield; I haven't.
    I wonder if his wish for greater representation of specific areas of Plainfield might be met by, say, six ward seats, and an at-large candidate who would serve as council president, representing all of us. (This is actually Rashid's idea; I met him over corned beef and cabbage at Vivace's after he testified.
    I worry a "full-time" mayor would meddle in day-to-day affairs (look at what's happening with a "part-time" mayor who appointed herself "acting city administrator," an accurate reflection of what she had been doing for years.") Despite Rashid's hope a mayor could help produce "better schools," there is no chance of that. Board of Education separate and way out of City's control

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Pat.. something needs to be done to break the death grip the Local Democratic Bosses -- JERRY AND UNION COUNTY DEMS INCLUDED have over this city.
      Anyone who can look at the City Government of Plainfield now and can possibly think the # of wards is working is crazy...
      Bill Reid said it best himself, "If you don't like it, move" ... HIS WARD ALONE should be broken up into 4 pieces just for punishment of having elected him repeatedly to office..

      Delete
  5. Who was the Mayor when the PMUA was formed? Who was the Mayor that thought they would end up as the PMUA Attorney at some point in time?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I wonder if they will interview former chiefs of police and the chiefs association to get viewpoints other than the politicians distorted views.

    ReplyDelete
  7. How about burney explain exactly how a full time mayor can improve the schools reduce crime and obtain more jobs.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Burney. Think about it since you were a council person. The council has no control over the board of Ed.

    ReplyDelete
  9. It was former mayor Mark Fury who inflicted the PMUA on us. The committee should be careful in weighing the value of his testimony.

    ReplyDelete