Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Party On

In Plainfield, Democrats outnumber Republicans 12 to 1, but you can bet there were more than a few who tuned in to hear Gov. Chris Christie give the keynote speech at the Republican National Convention. More than 40 percent of Union County voters pushed the voting booth button for Chris Christie in 2009 and he has been pushing other people's buttons ever since.

For some, Christie represented a possible correction to the entrenched Democratic rule that in some cases had lapsed into entitlement and even actionable corruption. Commenters on newspaper forums clamored for Christie to bring his reform team to Union County, but as the recent news from Trenton attests, there were more serious issues elsewhere.

As Republicans at the national level formed an implacable wall against President Barack Obama, Christie went mano a mano against Democratic leadership in New Jersey and wrested compromises on some thorny issues. He even mentioned this tack in his keynote speech, though it contrasts with the salted-earth tactics of national Republican leaders whose only goal was a one-term Obama.

But one reason local Democratic voters want Obama re-elected is that they cannot envision having hard-hearted, monomaniac Republicans in charge of the nation. Obama's use of reason and compassion in national leadership is something these voters want to preserve.

The sharp contrast between national party leaders is almost reversed at the state or local levels. Democrats who revere Obama deplore the small-minded outlook of some entrenched local leaders, while those running for office as Republicans often must distinguish themselves from the larger GOP representation.

This dichotomy has at times led to calls for non-partisan city elections, but meanwhile voters do have the option of choosing across party lines in the November general election. In 2012, city Democrats can pretty much look with favor on the whole ticket, but for the future, it is good to remember that options can exist in November.

--Bernice

20 comments:

  1. "Obama's use of reason and compassion in national leadership is something these voters want to preserve."

    You'd have to hold a gun to my head to vote for this failed President and it's NOT about the color of his skin. His policies are NOT working and I cannot afford 4 more years of that. Who can?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Bernice,

    I would encourage voters to vote for the person not the party. We have local elections and just because someone is on the party line, doesn't mean they are good for Plainfield. I wish more people would think before they vote and be informed. It is our fault that we have politicians who feel entitled and do not do what is best for the people.

    Bob Bolmer

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yet you could afford 4 more years or Bush failed economics and this new person the GOP is running is worse "not the color of his skin my foot", man/woman up and show your true colors, you can trust and believe no one is sleeping and are well aware that prejudice is alive and well in this country.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Bernice, I would encourage everyone to get out the VOTE. A VOTE for Romney is a VOTE for George Bush and how he left this mess of a Country. The real Truth is that the BUSH administration have had over 16 years of failed policies. When his father was in office President Clinton had to come in with a pooper scooper and clean up behind him. Then you had his son whom messed this country up even more. When President Clinton left we had a surplus then the Bushes got their hands on this country again and left us in a depression. Everyone in America at least the majority of us know it will take more than 4 years to clean this mess up. It took George Bush more than 4years to mess our great country up, and it will take President Obama more than 4years to clean this mess up. I know once he wins the election it will no stopping him. I will be out there getting out the VOTE. I go to PA every weekend to campaign. We Will March On To Victory in November.

    Renee

    ReplyDelete
  5. @Anonymous 9:50am - nobody wants to be considered a "racist" not even the racists. And . . . you don't have to worry about voting for OUR President when someone puts a gun to your head because believe me they will end up using it.

    And the answer to your question- I can afford FOUR MORE years of OUR President Barack Obama. We need to MOVE FORWARD not go backward.

    CT

    ReplyDelete
  6. A recent poll revealed that 0% of black Americans intended to vote for Romney. Zero percent! Perhaps racism has added a less familiar voice this election season.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Unfortunately there is ignorance along all racial lines.

    So many times we are fooled into thinking and believing that because an individual shares our cultural background, looks like us or speaks the same language we do, that individual will identify with us -- unfortunately that is not always the case -- it's much more a need on our part to cling to someone with whom we believe will identify with our perspectives, opinions and struggles, etc. Our experiences and our environment form who we are just as much as our race or cultural heritage.

    I certainly don't favor Romney/Paul and I won't be voting for them, but Barack Obama is just another politician, and in this case, the "lesser of two evils" -- President Obama has disappointed many who voted for him, across the board.

    Racism is alive and well, and that's all-around too bad; however, because one doesn't agree with President Obama's policies or what he has done in the past 4 years, does not make one a racist.

    Let's have a civil and educated discussion about the issues and let's leave race out it. It not always about race (think Republican poltical folk who have gained great support within the non African-American community: Condoleeza Rice, Colin Powell and Herman Caine to name a few).

    Let's move on.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Will the last Republican who leaves the City please turn the lights off. I will hate to see when the gaggle of geese whom gave us the PMUA and the Mayor are finished running this place. Bob Ferrarro ... we miss you, RIP - we sure are not.

    ReplyDelete
  9. When will all wake up and realize that the real issue is our middle class. The middle class is what separates our nation from those nations we call the 3rd world. It's not a Republican\Democrat political issue which are both two sides of the same coin. The real issue issue is the constant erosion of the standard of living of the middle class and our ability to thrive. Which can be attributed to the influence of deep pocket corporations and the power hungry politicians they support on both sides. Both parties are equally invested in this shame.
    Who will look out for us, the people?

    Please vote responsibly for the best interest of your family ,friends and yourself in all elections. Dorien Hurtt

    ReplyDelete
  10. Always fascinating (and sad) to read the silly, nonsensical comments people make about Obama. People may not like his policies and that is fine - but the reality is most of the people blathering on about them don't even know what they are. They also think that the Pesidency is all powerful and can make anything they want happen - or that the President has any real impact on job creation in the short term. I would suggest people take a little time and study the issues - understand how government was set-up and then look at things in a new light. Using standard talking points from TV show talking heads is a sad way to participate in political dialogue. Also - might be worth while to give some thought to the idea that anyone who believes a "one percenter" like Romney is going to do anything to effect the lives of the 99% is probably not thinking clearly. We have serious issues to resolve in this country but the sky is not falling and we are not becoming socialists. Stop falling for the TV bullshit - it does nothing to advance the nation.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Right after President Obama's inauguration, the US Senate Republican leader stated that their primary aim would be to make sure Obama is a one-term president. The Republicans in Congress have followed his lead and blocked the passage of much legislation that would have been good for the country and the majority of its citizens--all in an effort to make sure Obama's program of change for the better doesn't get anywhere.

    All we're hearing now from the big Republicans like Ryan and Christie is "tax cuts." But what they mean is lots more money in the pockets of the 1 percent.

    I don't know about you, but I'm a member of the 99 percent and I'm voting to re-elect Obama.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dottie .. You really believe the crap coming from the NJ Democrats ?? You apparently, LIKE JERRY GREEN and a WHOLE PILE OF MORON DEMOCRATS in NJ conveniently forget the Legislature COULD HAVE passed an extension on the BUMP in the tax rate for the Millionaires and CORZINE WOULD have signed it.. but what did they do Dottie.. They played POLITICS. Because they knew there were a SLEW of SIMPLETONS who JUST DON'T GET IT that their PARTY FOR THE PEOPLE don't give a damn about them just like the EVIL Republicans. If you're going to quote party dogman and be their mouth piece choose your words more wisely so you don't sound like a half-wit like Jerry Green and the other blow hards holding Plainfied back. Where were Jerry and the other PARTY FOR THE PEOPLE fighters for your little hospital cause Dottie ??? Where were they ??? NOT THERE FOR YOU OR PLAINFIELD. SO WAKE UP.

      Delete
  12. The President had both the House and the Senate for two years. He got everything he wanted. Where did it get us? No where.

    As for tax cuts, no one is calling for more tax cuts. The Bush tax cuts, which included EVERYONE, have been in effect for 10 years, so at this point, if it would be a tax increase if you raise taxes at this point in time.

    As for as NJ goes, Corzine and the democrats raised the tax rates on the rich for "one year". Corzine and the democrats had the chance to extend the tax increase, but they chose not to. Now the dems use it to accuse Christie of being FOR tax cuts. What Christie is for, is not raising taxes on anyone.

    This class warfare has got to stop. Who wants to raise taxes on anyone? I've never been for tax increases for anyone, and I'm sure no has every rallied to increase taxes, until now. Why is that? It's because they don't have a record to run on.

    BTW, I thank the 1% for paying more than their fair share. For anyone to think they don't pay their fair share is ludicrous. The government needs to get their spending under control. Plain and simple.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Rob - I am a democrat and support Obama for numerous reasons and not a single one of them has anything to do with Green or any other machine boss in NJ. I can't peak for Dottie but your reply to her comment wasn't related to what she said. I have lived all over the country and NJ has THE WORST party system I have seen. In Plainfield I am embarrassed to say I am a democrat but that has nothing to do with the presidential race.

    6:38 - I don't know what to say to you other than your comments are confused. A multi-millionaire paying a marginal rate of 13-15% might be paying a lot in terms of dollars but when you have a family of 3 paying a higher percentage of their income (18-25%) there is something wrong with that. If you can't see the difference then I don't know what to tell you. The wealthy have huge advantages with tax codes and corporate welfare programs - and there starts the shrinking of the middle class. It isn't class warfare - it's leveling the playing field. If you think a Romney or any other wealthy republican is going to level the field or look out for your interests you are mistaken. If you think the GOP cares about the deficit, you are mistaken and history has demonstrated that. Romney made his millions (like all private equity companies do) by using debt as leverage and walking away with their investment and large profit.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Rob - are you just mistakenly posting your comments to the wrong thread? I say that because once again your comment simply makes no sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. - I can't peak for Dottie but your reply to her comment wasn't related to what she said.

      All we're hearing now from the big Republicans like Ryan and Christie is "tax cuts." But what they mean is lots more money in the pockets of the 1 percent.

      read it slow...

      Delete
    2. Rob - forgive my confusion that your reply of "uh Christie" was intended for two comments up and directed at one of several points that person was attempting to make. Your last comment about Ryan/Christie is dead on. Avfew more lopsided tax cuts and the transformation to an oligarchy should be almost complete! Gonna give Russia a run for their money! Haha

      Delete
  15. wow....Anonymous...
    That comment about Ryan / Christie was Dotties: NOT GOOD ON THE READ
    "uhhh Christie" : was pointing out why comment was of relevance

    ReplyDelete
  16. Under Obama we have effectively had a tax hike and loss of income -- and future loss of income.

    Because the Fed decided to do quantitative easing -- ie, the Fed printed money and lowered tax rates to try to keep the housing market. Why? Because if you allowed the market correct (which it eventually must), then big companies, people with pensions (ie states and other large entities with pension plans) would lose money, because banks sold mortgage-backed securities to everyone.

    So, with all the money printing, the dollar has devalued. Our money is worth less. People aren't getting raises, commodities such as food and utilities are rising. States aren't "raising taxes" -- but we are getting hit with fees all over.

    Obama and the government have borrowed and spent an incredible amount of money to "fix" the economy -- which has been a bandaid, which will not stop the eventual market corrections that must occur.

    Banks are offering low mortgage rates - 3.2-4.5, yet, student loan rates are at 8-11%. This makes no sense, if our government really wants to invest in our future.

    Now young Americans are faced with high student loans, an incredible debt, and a stagnant and declining job market.

    The Obamacare health mandates will seriously affect small businesses. Employee taxes are nothing to sneeze at -- and now the government REQUIRING health care is another cost to small businesses. Most will just not hire.

    More Federal borrowing I don't see fixing the problem. How about significant tax credits for businesses that hire in the US, instead of offshore?

    The Democrats, instead of allowing the banks take the financial hit for the bad mortgage loans, took on the bad loans. Basically, 'we the people' will take the loss -- not the fat cat 1%. The Democrats can say they are "for the people" -- but they are in bed with big money just as much as the Republicans. All politicians need/court/are in bed with the big money.

    We need real reforms -- political, health care tort reform, stopping the skimming/abuses/wasteful spending at all levels of government.

    As long as big business holds the political pursestrings at the state and national level, I don't see that happening.

    ReplyDelete