Friday, February 22, 2013

Armory Topic at March 6 Zoning Board Meeting

A year after being auctioned off by the state, the Armory will be the topic of  a Board of Adjustment hearing on its proposed use as a "daycare and aftercare facility."

HOPES Community Action Partnership of Hoboken is the applicant, according to a legal notice published today. The Armory at Leland Avenue and East Seventh Street is in a low/moderate density residential zone where the proposed use is not permitted. The use variance and other relief is on the agenda for the March 6 Board of Adjustment meeting, 7 p.m. in City Hall Library.

The Armory was auctioned off for $926,000 early in 2012 after various city schemes for its use fell through. The auction results had to be passed by legislation and was not final until December. (Note: Click here, but story links no longer work).

The HOPES web site lists three addresses for its services in Plainfield, at 7-9 Watchung Ave., New Horizons at 110-128 W. Front St., and St. Mary's at 513 W. Sixth St.

According to the legal notice, variances needed for the Armory site are:
17:9-7.B - The proposed uses are not permitted in the R-3 Zone. Requires a use variance.
17:9-7.D - A minimum rear yard setback of 30 feet is required, the existing warehouse has a rear yard setback of 9.83 feet, while the proposed addition will have a rear yard setback of 9.83 feet.
17:9-7.D - The maximum permitted lot coverage is 40%. The existing lot coverage is 82.26% which will be reduced to 79.61%.
Relief Required from Supplementary Zoning Regulations
17:9-23 - There is a limitation in the residential zones of a single principal structure. There are presently two principal structures on site.
17:9-24A&B - A residential use shall have a 10 foot buffer from all uses other than one and two family dwellings. The existing warehouse has a buffer which is 9 feet, 10 inches from adjoining residential property designated as Lot 3, Block 625.
17:9-24.D.2 - Loading areas shall be screened by a minimum 10 feet tall visually impervious screen. The two loading areas on the northwest (rear) elevation do not meet this requirement.
17:9-24.E1&2 - HVAC and utilities must be buffered 3 feet wide and screened 4 feet high around all sides. This is not met.
17:9-27 - Encroachment is not permitted in the public right-of-way without approval of Plainfield City Council. Landscaping, 5 light poles, curbing, and a portion of the first 22 parking spaces are located within the public right-of-way facing East 7th Street.
17:9-42.E - Parking lots are not permitted in any required side yard setback area and front yard area. Parking is located within the side yard setback and front yard areas.
17:9-42.H - Curb cuts for 10 feet wide driveways shall be a maximum of 14 feet wide. Curb cuts for 20 foot wide driveways shall be a maximum of 26 feet wide. The driveway on E. 7th Street is 24 feet wide and the curb cut is 35 feet, 5 inches. The driveway on Leland Avenue is 24 feet wide, and the curb cut is 38 feet, 5 inches.
17:9-42.K - The Land Use Ordinance does not contain an off-street parking requirement for the requested uses. The parking requirement shall be determined during a Public Hearing. The applicant proposes 82 parking spaces. A parking variance may be required.
17:9-42.N - Driveways in Residential Zones shall not provide access to non-permitted uses. The driveways on both E. 7th Street and Leland Avenue now and with the proposed uses will provide access to non-permitted uses.
17:9-42.P - All uses other than one and two family homes shall not have parking within the front yard area. The parking is located within the front yard area.
17:9-43.B - A minimum of 5% of the interior of a parking lot shall be provided with planting islands containing a minimum of 1 deciduous tree for every 5 parking spaces abutting said island. The 82 parking spaces which are proposed have a total of 4 new trees, sixteen are required. No deciduous trees are proposed. 


































3 comments:

  1. It's a good piece of property. We don't need any more schools taking up prime real estate. I hope they are not allowed the variances.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Why would any organization invest $926,000 speculating that they would receive the necessary variances for their proposed use of the property? Unless of course they had sufficient assurances beforehand that these variances would be approved.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. and the prize goes to the person with the winning question and answer all in one !

      Delete