Tuesday, March 20, 2012

PMUA Study Sparks Calls for Dissolution

A highly detailed presentation by a citizen task force Monday boiled down to three options: Fix the troubled Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority, dissolve it or do nothing. Council President Adrian Mapp then urged the governing body to come up with a super-majority - five of seven possible votes - in favor of dissolution.

About 200 residents filled the Washington Community School cafetorium for the presentation, with more than two dozen speaking out on the findings. Research on the authority's workings ran to more than 10,000 pages on operations and costs of providing sewer and solid waste services to city households. Comparisons with similar municipalities found PMUA services to be more expensive and to require many more employees than others. But setting aside the option of doing nothing, the task force suggested fixing PMUA by finding $8 million in savings to bring authority costs in line with others, having fiscal and forensic audits and a managerial analysis and by being more selective in choosing commissioners. A suggestion to take back a recent $1 million settlement with former executives drew applause.

But so did the prospect of dissolution, although some residents warned of debt and job loss resulting from that option. Of five council members present, four - Annie McWilliams, Cory Storch, Rebecca Williams and Mapp - spoke in favor of dissolution, though with certain caveats. Vera Greaves called for fixing the problems uncovered by the task force and William Reid and Bridget Rivers were absent.

Among comments from the public, Tom Kaercher called dissolution "absolutely" the answer.

"You can't make them listen to you," he told the council. "You have to get rid of them."

Frank D'Aversa said the PMUA resembled other institutions that "start out like Robin Hood and end up like the  Mafia."

"The PMUA has to reform its upper management," he said. As for dissolution, he said, "The public needs to know what will it cost."

Murray Roberts, a 42-year city resident, deplored "cronyism" and questioned how many of the authority's 171 workers are "friends and family."

"This is a 'crony' kind of town," Roberts said, adding, "I hope you will make every effort to make sure the PMUA does not continue to exist."

But Rose Cabbagestalk said, "Let's fix the problem," expressing concern about the number of jobs that would be lost.

Mapp answered her concern by saying there would still be jobs.

"My vision for the PMUA is that it will come in-house." he said.

"You say you don't have the votes," resident Pat Van Slyke said to the council. "You work for us. Who's voting up or down on dissolution?"

Her question brought out the 4-1 split among those present, Mapp having already read a prepared statement earlier in favor of dissolution. But in concluding remarks, task force chairman Joseph Ruffin said he did not see any charge to the group "to look for dissolution" and said he saw a "preconceived notion" in Mapp's prepared remarks.

Asked to respond after the meeting, Mapp said the report contained "information in the public domain" which gave a factual basis for his conclusion.

The presentation was recorded for broadcast on local cable channels and the complete report can be obtained through an OPRA request in the City Clerk's office. it will also be posted on the city web site.

Besides Ruffin, members of the task force were  Thomas Crownover, Elizabeth D'Aversa, Marian Clemmons, Nan Anderson and Ann Mosley. Though established in May 2011, it did not meet until September 21 and did not receive requested information from the PMUA until November.

PMUA officials declined to take part in the meeting, although Commissioners Malcolm Dunn, Cecil Sanders and the Rev. Tracey Brown were in the audience.

--Bernice

28 comments:

  1. Now that the task force has spoken, it is time (as it has been for 15 years) for City Council action.

    I, for one, am not 100% convinced that dissolution is the right move. Having an affirmative mission to handle a public health matter keeps our sewers from becoming holey like our streets. In theory, at least, PMUA should be seamless and transparent, charge a fair price, and be cognizant that it works for all of us, not just for the elite with local political connections.

    I'm not convinced that keeping the Authority is right either. Its track record of abuses is damning, and its costliness is a direct byproduct of independence without supervision, as well as a hefty appetite for paying off the usual cast of characters. The expense of an added bureaucracy is obvious. It may be too much to expect any change.

    PMUA deserves a timeout in deep-freeze. City residents deserve answers and explanations. However, none of us will be served by precipitous action and the desire to get from A to Z without effort and without the whole story being laid out for all to see.

    Any way you look at it, the PMUA has been mismanaged and lacks credible oversight. This should change immediately.

    Regardless of its ultimate fate, PMUA's Board of Commissioners needs to be removed. There is more than adequate legal justification (theft and gross negligence). This process should start as early as the next Council meeting.

    Once this is accomplished, state assistance is required. A trustee should be appointed for an interim period during which the Authority will undergo an extensive audit so we can tell with certainty how its money is spent. During this time, PMUA's management will make all efforts to streamline and rationalize its operations and cost structure. It's only fair that we have an opportunity to see everything laid out, and give PMUA the chance to make necessary changes to become the best possible Authority we can expect, or it is able to accomplish.

    At that point we can make a fair and educated assessment. It will be too much for our politicians though, so they should not be so presumptuous that a)they think they know better than we do, and b) they honestly believe they will not be swayed by yelling and screaming, whining, self-interest, or political ambition.

    If anything was obvious from last night's meeting, the Council has no stomach for big decisions. It should punt on giving PMUA a thumbs-up or thumbs-down, by placing that decision squarely where it belongs, in the laps of Plainfield voters. There are twenty months for an audit and operational changes to be made, for the sides to be drawn, and for healthy debate. By the general election in November 2013 the question of PMUA should be on the ballot as a binding referendum.

    What more cover could our politicians want?

    In the meanwhile, City Council action is required. Start with the commissioners. Immediately. Their misdeeds (if not crimes) are well-documented. Don't do it, or kick it down the road, and we will know you are (for lack of a better word) unfit for public office.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Reid and Rivers absent as usual. When will the voters learn and ditch these losers. It's not like they're missing occasionally, but they are missing at many important events and for important votes. Fixing the PUMA may cost us more than getting rid of this albatross. Whether we fix it or ditch it, I hope we get rid of Dunn and his ilk as they are as crooked as the days are getting long.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The PMUA Task Force owned the stage last night but Adrian Mapp stole the show.

    He stood by his convictions.

    jim spear

    ReplyDelete
  4. When Mapp actually casts a vote we'll see about his convictions. Thus far he's 0-4 when it comes to selling out the city to the likes of Malcolm Dunn.

    The first step to reform is to remove the commissioners. Let's see what he does with that.

    Really Jim, get a grip.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan,

      Mapp has stated for my years that he felt the PMUA should be folded back into the city. After events of the last few months, whether they were appointments of commissioners, comments to the Courier News, or getting the RDO line, I was interested in seeing whether he stood by that conviction. He indeed did.

      As far as your comments about removing commissioners, you do a disservice to the community when your facts are incorrect. The council does not have that authority.

      jim spear

      Delete
  5. Mapp is only saying that because of the election. He knows what the public wants but his votes and statements to the Courier last month spoke volumes. He has had more than 3 years to do something and hasn't. I am fed up with the rhetoric. Last night's slide with the totals of employees and costs for Union and New Brunswick spoke volumes. We in Plainfield are overpaying for these services by $8-10 million. This isn't chump change, we are talking real money. If the council was so worried about the mayor's $20k expenditure what about the PMUA's $20 MILLION?

    The task force should be commended for their analysis. I only wish that our council had the guts to make a decision! They are cowards who want to keep kicking the can down the road. At some point people will just move out of Plainfield because we have had enough.

    ReplyDelete
  6. How does anyone expect Reid/Rivers to show up to something like this? Reid's daughter works for PMUA and Rivers son does as well. What are you expecting them to do? Go against their own children?

    PMUA is laced with people who'll never work anywhere else. The company is a dump and a complete embarrassment to our community. How can we rise against this type of behavior when people we elect manifests it daily.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Maybe it's a naive question, but does Council have rules which require that a member with an obvious conflict of interest, such as having a member of the immediate family employed by the very entity which is the subject of the vote, abstain?

    ReplyDelete
  8. EXACTLY!!! Anon 1:14.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 21, 2012 at 9:29 AM

    Wow,I hope that we can go after PSE&G with such
    vigor...But no!!! We are so determined to concentrate on an entity created for the betterment of the City of Plainfield by a Plainfielder...It really astounds me to see such Conflicts of Interest being revealed by the very leaders whom have benefitted by the PMUA...NoW I have been and continue to be a person who lives by the motto "If you can not bring value to any situation... leave it alone." But we consistently want to go after our own whom should be honored but instead we try to villify...As a potential investor looking in...Todsy I would never choose to do any Business here and I would set my sights in other areas because of Plainfields lack of LOYALTY!!!!
    You leaders keep on revealing your dirty laudry for all to see and LAUGH AT!!!
    THANK YOU PLAINFIELD FOR YOUR CIRCUS TYPE BAFOONARY...TODAY YOU ARE DISQUALIFIED!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. The PPC is exactly the mentality of why Plainfield hasn't been elevated to the best it can be. Somehow people who don't want change have the attitude of "not going after our own" or "taking care of our own" These are eerily reminiscent of the fear about someone taking over.

    Why even mention PSE&G? They are at the very least regulated. The PMUA is and was up until this point untouchable. The leaders in Plainfield are finally waking up. Get real... at least $8 million bloated? That says alot. Either clean up the abuse and misuse of funds or get out! It's that simple.

    This isn't about loyalty. That's the reason that Watson and Ervin were gifted the $1 million. People aren't going to do their business in Plainfield because of the corruption of entities like the PMUA.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I can't get the reply button to work, but this is for Jim up the queue.

    Why do you say the Council can't? Per the charter Section 2.8, the City Council can investigate and remove any officer or employee, other than the mayor or another city councilman. For cause, upon notice, and an opportunity to be heard. If they appoint them, they can get rid of them. And there's ample cause.

    I think I know what Reid, Rivers, and Greaves expected when they voted for Dunn and Sanders. But just what did Mapp expect? Did McWilliams see Dunn as the source of sage wisdom?

    I'll take some measure of accountability before a ton of rhetoric. Mapp is good at WBLS wiffle ball, but PMUA is the majors.

    This is like the pay-to-play ordinances, and the next thing you know is he's taking money from Remington & Vernick. Now there was conviction.

    ReplyDelete
  12. How much did the buffoon name "Plainfield Peace Coalition" get paid to make idiotic comments. The PUMA is a proven waste our the rate payers' money and they should be investigated, so what's the point of the "Coalition"? Enlighten me, please.

    ReplyDelete
  13. To Plainfield Peace Coalition, please send me your address so that you can pay my thousands of dollars in sewage and waste water bill.

    I have a question for you, do you pay for your services or are you on some sort of assistance that pays it for you?

    I am not being mean, I just cannot understand the menatality of people who willingly agree to be ripped off, unless they are not affected themselves.

    By the way, if you look at PSE&G bills in Plainfield and surrounding towns, they are comparable. So no ripp off - which is the point of PMUA.

    I have read that Plainfield is called the welfare city because so many people are on assistance - and people come here to get the assistance.

    It appears quite the contrary, people here have more money that they need. They don't care that the mayor spends their money on whatever she wants (which then means that our taxes go up to support her illegal spending), they don't care that PMUA is blatently overcharging us, and they willingly give 1 MILLION dollars away. Who wants to adopt me?

    ReplyDelete
  14. Having studied, met with officials of the PMUA, OPRA'd records and followed the OPRA'd material of others it is my opinion that a cost reduction of $5,000,000 is achievable, As the PMUA is constituted, burdened with the oppressive Bond Debt, and other committed payouts, not the least of which are the remaining payments on the $1,000,000 gift to the Retirees, $8,000,000 is not seen as achievable. By reducing the work force by 50 people through attrition you have the first $3,000,000. By consolidating the locations you have at a minimum the #250,000 per year currently being paid for the Park Avenue office. By selling the Roosevelt Avenue Building you will have $750,000 which can be used to reduce the Bond debt and as a consequence the associated interest at say $22,000 per year. By terminating IMMEDIATELY the illegal benefits payments to the 3 Commissioners still receiving them you have $45,000 per year. By reducing the superfluous legal and a host of other unnecessary consulting services you have another, say, $250,000 to $300,000 per year. By terminating the lease for the lot on Cottage Place you have $24,000 per year. By not restoring the position of Deputy Executive Director you have $150,000 per year. By consolidating the locations I estimate that you can save $100,000 in services which are now duplicated ( communications, maintenance, reception, office machines, etc.). By bringing the new Executive Director's salary in line with market you have $25,000 per year. The entire purchasing operation warrants scrutiny. At the last meeting the purchase of a new front end loader was authorized, a John Deere modelfor $188,000. The work horses in heavy construction are Catepillar and Komatsu. That aside, it was reported that only 1 bid was submitted. The construction equipment market is desperate for sales. The procedure that was capable of eliciting only 1 response warrants examination.

    I think we are around $5,000,000 outlined above as a get started. This said, even if these adjustments were made, the Bonds are maturing in increasing amounts. The wizards that constructed the Bond deals and incurred this oppressive debt pushed the redemption dates far enough ahead in anticipation that they would be gone when the Bonds matured and someone else would be holding the bag. They were successful. We will need millions of dollars in cost reductions not to reduce the rates...but just to stay even. Bill Kruse

    ReplyDelete
  15. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 21, 2012 at 11:10 PM

    Wow Unknown...I did not see any solution in your statement... But to answer your question
    I am worth more than this town can afford...
    Oh by the way..I own out right...When you were cashing the Home equity checks at Costco...I invested mine...Hahahahaha.
    Next time you are at your favorite Liquor store ask for Silk Vodka...Oh sorry you maybe a non drinker...Well 150 million others do!!!!
    I laugh all the way to the bank
    I love you anyway

    ReplyDelete
  16. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 21, 2012 at 11:36 PM

    The point of the Plainfield Peace Coalition is in response to our Children whom since being under-educated due to lack of text books in our 100million dollar school system have gravitated to seek the lore of the streets and absolutely hate all of us who are over 30years of age...Let me remind you that there have been multile assassinations and maimings of our children from 3years old to 25...I am not a politician and I am not paid by PMUA..I am just a VET who did all the things being done here in our streets...I wish that you can understand that whatever I did benefitted the whole Country...What I see our Children doing is Macabre and worthless, I have been in the midst of several shooting incidents here in Plainfield and on Church property...
    Yes I am loyal to Erick Watson because he was the only CEO who never turned his back on our youth...He actuallly hired many of our children who many of them were laughed at by possible employers from surrounding areas who by the way have hired illegal help...My guess is that 2 bucks an hour beats the going wage
    Thank you for your insight and I hope that this is clear to you...ERICK WATSON HIRED MANY OF OUR YOUTH..GAVE SECOND CHANCES TO THEM...He represents Leadership...African American LEADERSHIP...Yes I should not have talked about PSE&G but these both entities are regulated by the state contrary to many peoples knowledge....Your diligence in not wanting to pay too much for services should be commended...Where were you when Plainfield sold a 21million dollar yearly income (sewer) to a private concern for 19million, Did you complain then?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 21, 2012 at 11:59 PM

    No it is not called the welfare City by African Americans...It is called this by ignorant Defenders of the original Constitution
    where it still states that Africans...people of color are 3/5s human...I rewmember being chased out of neighborhoods due to this reteric
    Recently a white man shot an African American Child due to being a person of color
    Please continue to be mean and spite ful and white...While I continue to love you any way
    but do not think for a minute that I am colonialized NOOOO way!!!! I just like to deal with people like you who are real instead of you smiling caucasions who do more damage with your falsehood and fake friendship just to get over
    Please remember we see through you and laugh at you like an old episode of Archie Bunker
    how old and worh out!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This isn't about Watson (spelling) hiring those without jobs! This is about the wasted dollars. The hiring of ex-cons is a front for more serious criminal activity. The front line workers aren't the ones benefiting from the theft of millions annually.

      It's no wonder Jerry Green doesn't want to do anything about the PMUA

      Delete
    2. PPC, why do black people always pull out the race card when their backed into a corner on their facts?

      Delete
  18. PPC, will you please state when the sale of a sewer component was made to a private entity and who the private entity was?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 22, 2012 at 6:16 AM

    The sale was done in the 90s!!!
    Do your research...
    Well according to most records
    Our National Politicians have been bought by
    HMOs (Health Management Organizations) to the tunes of 250K-900K...Is there outrage about waste of finances by these very entities whom continue to take our money and deny treatment
    The best contact for you should be Dottie G
    she will be able to enlighten you all Thank God for this woman

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. ahhh, I just figured out who PPC is - Jerry Green, the comment about Dottie G, confirmed it.

      Jerry, please push the spell check button!

      Delete
  20. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 22, 2012 at 1:18 PM

    We would like to invite you all to a meeting on April 4th Wednesday at 7pm...The location is posted on meet up . com/Plainfield Peace Coalition Group.
    Bring all your questions and concerns to this meeting.
    Oh Bernice the sale of the sewer rights was during the Mitchell Administration...Please contact Dottie G.
    Oh by the way I hope that you do find Silk Vodka because they just ran out of it again
    We may have some refreshments at the meeting
    Thank you all

    ReplyDelete
  21. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 22, 2012 at 1:28 PM

    Hey Mark
    Are you law enforcement????
    The allegations being reported by you
    are very SERIOUS!!! I have no knowledge of Gangsters in this particular institution..
    It is not a good thing to level false inferences toward a Business just because of the color of persons within...Why don't you make an attempt to be part of the negiotiation process in solving the high costs of service.
    I would like to be in this dialog...

    ReplyDelete
  22. Plainfield Peace CoalitionMarch 22, 2012 at 1:34 PM

    To anonymous
    Do not be fearful of being exposed
    I understand that being in this state of anon.
    You can be and say whatever comes to mind..Wow
    this is the type of person who states "Count me in But dont count on me."
    How soft ooops I hope I spelled everything right but if not I would not count on YOU!!!
    continue to be a non identifiable weak and cowardly person We love you aany way

    ReplyDelete
  23. OK, PPC, you have worn out your welcome on my blog. Anyone interested in what PPC aka Davy Morales has to say can go to his meet-up.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Davy Morales is a true PMUA-ite. He received thousands of dollars and holds several meet and greets each year. It's no wonder he made the comments he did.

    ReplyDelete