Wednesday, June 27, 2012

City's Future a Hot Topic at Town Meeting

Economic development emerged as a key topic at the City Council's final Town Meeting for 2012, with a Rutgers student offering suggestions and council members calling for more effort from the administration.

The Town Meeting Tuesday was held at Jefferson School in the Fourth Ward, but residents from across the city were welcome to speak at any of the four ward meetings. Resident Jeanette Criscione kicked off the discussion by asking, "What is happening with economic development? You don't hear anything about it."

Her question led to an earful for the dozen attendees, starting with Council President Adrian Mapp's assertion that the administration is not being helpful to the one individual who is leading development currently in the city. Though he did not name the developer, Mapp was alluding to Frank Cretella, who has seven projects in the works downtown. Mapp said he has asked new Public Works & Urban Development Director Eric Jackson to ease "challenges" the developer is facing.

Councilwoman Rebecca Williams cited the appearance of city storefronts as a possible deterrent to development and called for more education for owners on property maintenance codes, while Councilman William Reid said the city needs a director to focus on economic development.

Williams faulted a former PW&UD director who served during the first four-year term of Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs as being ineffective, but said "I am confident that Mr. Jackson has what it takes."

Criscione asked whether Jackson could provide periodic reports on economic development at council meetings, but Mapp said the mayor has rebuffed efforts to get reports from economic development committees or from Jackson.

Councilwoman Vera Greaves said before anything can be done to get developers to come to Plainfield, "We need to clean it up."

Criscione said everything needed for property code maintenance was already "on the books," but needs enforcement. Williams saw  hope for that in Jackson, who came to the city in September, and noted the "high premium he placed on training."

Reid, normally a staunch supporter of the mayor, said, "We haven't had anything that I'm impressed with over the last seven years."

Reid and Mapp both pointed to 2013, when the mayor's second term is up, as an opportunity for change.

That's when Rutgers student Ronald Johnson Jr. said it was "not really being fair in a way" to say it was too late for the current administration to get anything done, but Reid stuck to his guns, saying the person at the top has to lead development.

"You have to show them that they can come here and make money," he said.

Mapp made the analogy of buying a car that turns out to be a "lemon" with an expired warranty.

"The people of Plainfield may have purchased a lemon and it's too late," he said.

But Johnson said, "Planning and economic development go hand in hand," and praised Planning Director Bill Nierstedt and Economic Development Director Jacques Howard. The deterrents, he said, included crime levels and the city's  appearance, with steel gates downtown that cause safety fears.

Encouraged by Reid and Mapp to share his views, Johnson suggested conversion of the city's former industrial corridor to loft housing inviting to a "creative class" that would reinvigorate the city. Mapp asked whether Johnson would like to be part of a new economic development committee and Johnson said, "That would be a dream come true."

(Plaintalker has invited Johnson to submit a guest column to expand on his views.)


 Other topics at the Town Meeting included another chapter in the ongoing baseball league saga. Resident Inez Durham said she was shocked while watching her nephew play in the Queen City Baseball League Tuesday when a "representative" of the Recreation Division demanded that the team get off the field. Durham said coaches continued the game anyway, but the incident left a poor impression on visitors from Livingston.


"My question is, can anything be done about this issue?" Durham asked.


The person who interfered with the game was "Mr. Muhammad," she said.


Council members Reid and Mapp said the governing body's efforts to resolve the problem have failed.


"The mayor has done absolutely nothing to address the underlying (issues)," Mapp said.


The situation will not change, he said, "until the mayor does the right thing or voters do the right thing."


On another topic, the council was supposed to be meeting the public jointly with the Housing Authority of Plainfield Tuesday, but Mapp said he received a phone call at 5:30 p.m. saying the Housing Authority was not participating. He said the executive director and chairman wanted to attend but a majority of commissioners decided against it.

Mapp said he was "very insulted" that a body appointed by the council had opted not to participate. He said he had been asked what the format would be and had described it as "free-flowing."

The council will now check on whether commissioners have met their statutory training requirements and will exercise the governing body's powers of removal for those who have not, he said.

Reid said the chairman and one commissioner agreed to participate, but five commissioners said "no." He did not identify the commissioners by name. He also backed the need to meet statutory training requirements and said the state would remove any commissioners who failed to meet them.

One other concern at the meeting was raised by resident Melvin Cody, who asked who was in charge of the roadways at Rock Avenue and West Front Street. Cody expressed concern both about the poor condition of the intersection as well as street markings where children cross from Myrtle Avenue. Mapp and Reid agreed with his concerns, but Mapp said leadership was not coming from City Hall.

At the close of the meeting, Reid used the occasion to make a pitch for the July 7 parade and related events to "showcase Plainfield."
(See details here.)

--Bernice

14 comments:

  1. Leadership not coming from City Hall ... and not one on the city council with the cajones or brains to do anything about it.
    And we'll have the usual detractors of course...against what I say or people who are negative...cause that's what Plainfield needs, more sunshine blowing up some butts.
    Reid and Mapp both agree downtown code wise looks shabby. Mmmmm...so. ((( HUGE LEAP HERE ))) ... lets drag the people in charge of that... IN FRONT OF CITY COUNCIL !
    Years ago the State of NY slashed funding for Ag&Markets, the department that conducted "health" inspections, amongst other things, for Convenience stores, deli's and supermarkets.
    When they screamed FOUL that their department was targeted, the response they got from the Executive ( GOV ) and Legislative Offices ( Sen and Assembly ) was... Your department is now dependent on the fines it levies. You'll have to restructure and slim down your department but what remains will be funded by the fines you receive from violations. Most businesses cried foul that the State was now going to make a department dependent on them paying fines. Guess what.... Ag & Mkts in NYS still exists, it works quite will with it's staffing and inspections. Neither businesses nor employees of that department have an issue with it.
    Code enforcement can exist in Plainfield.
    1) You need the will to tell a business owner - 30 days or you are paying big time
    2) You need someone who will educate and have the will to fine
    3) You need a city council and mayors office that are both willing to review all codes to see what needs to be strengthened or removed
    4) This actually occurs in 1 or 2 cities across the United States..weird, I know.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was thinking about going to this meeting to follow-up on an email I sent City Council members asking how it was the Plainfield Housing Authority shows up in campaign filings as a contributor to Tracey Brown. The email was sent two weeks ago, but I have gotten no answer from any Council member.

    This is typical, so in a sense I am glad I decided not to go to this dog and pony episode.

    It's no wonder that problems and controversy fester. Most Council meetings accomplish little and resolve nothing. Between those members who protect Administration incompetence at virtually every turn, and those whose idea of governance is political skirmishing over ancient slights, should we really expect otherwise?

    It comes as no surprise that PHA commissioners nixed this meeting. Here's a Council that won't take action to remove the Recreation director despite extreme failures in its programming and methods. It won't even take action against PMUA commissioners who have been pilfering healthcare and other benefits in violation of state and local law, Tracey Brown among them. Sometimes it seems there is more interest in actually promoting the offenders, a number of whom I can think of off the top of my head.

    As I've noted previously, the delivery of social services (including Rec and Seniors) should be removed from city government, as should economic development. This isn't to say public officials will have no input. It's to provide mechanisms that broaden and democratize decision making, making all the initiatives more timely and effective, and less encumbered by the rancid politics locally and at the county level that have buried Plainfield under a heap of undeserving and unimaginative leadership.

    It's basically left us at the mercy of the self-interested, along with the hustlers and scammers who profiteer off our taxes, and the political mercenaries we call on to manage our affairs at the Director level, as if city residents are untrustworthy incompetents. Of course there is also a boatload of 'yes' men and women we call voters, who in the end enable it all anyway.

    Although Mr. Ronald Johnson's ideas for loft-living by creative types sounds appealing, increasing the supply of residential housing needs to take a back seat to bringing in commercial enterprises that provide skilled jobs, not simply store-front businesses that cater to a somewhat impoverished and beleaguered population.

    It's an idea (lofty, I guess) that may yet have its time and place, however he and my friend Jeanette Criscione may find their efforts to be more quixotic than realistic. They're dealing with a City Council and Administration where most words are wasted and impotence reigns supreme in the face of stormy seas, and sunny days.

    If this all sounds cynical, I apologize, and you are right. The more I learn and ponder what's going on here, the more cynical I've become.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan - couldn't have said it better myself. At the last meeting I attended they asked if Councilman Storch had any updates on Economic Development and they got the same answer I have heard at every other meeting "not at this time". I haven't seen anyone (administration or Council) step up with anything other than finger pointing and these weak references to a lack of power to do anything unilaterally. I am sure there are some authority issues in the charter but I would bet there are numerous powers the council has that could be used - i.e. Cutting off funds until something is addressed. Hell, even the simple threat might do the trick. The only conclusion that I can draw from this is a lack of interest in any meaningful progress. Whining and finger pointing does nothing but make everyone look foolish while the city suffers as a result.

      Delete
    2. Alan thank you for your feedback,

      I understand how you can get the interpretation that my idea was lofty. However, please realize that I quickly thought about it "on-the-spot". But of course, many times that's when the best ideas come out. Believe me, there IS a demand for specific-type housing in New Jersey, particularly loft-housing in Central Jersey. Not to say this will solve Plainfield's problems, but it may be apart of a larger strategy that can hold merit in getting Plainfield out of it's Economic Development pickle.
      My point- Respectfully, it's easy to detest ones ideas, but its easier to help them formulate it.

      Delete
    3. Ronald: I was also at that meeting and I found your questions smart and your comments refreshing and I was impressed by your "on-the-spot" quick thoughts.

      Bernice's coverage failed to mention your comments about crime and the perception of crime in Plainfield. You were right on - until we deal with these issues it will be difficult encouraging economic development. Ultimately the two need to work hand and hand - economic development will help to reduce crime and reduced crime will promote economic development.

      I always say we can't be so tempered that we are forced to stand by - it takes guts for a young college student to stand up at that mike and say how you feel and express your vision. Our city lacks visionary leaders, we surely have plenty of pundits behind computer screens, but we lack those who are willing to put themselves out there and help make this a great city. I hope you continue to be one of them.

      jim spear

      Delete
  3. The council won’t take any action because their all control by the puppet master, Jerry Green, they do what they are told. I’m not surprise the developer who is trying to build an apartment complex with retail space in the downtown area is encountering road blocks from the administration; after all, Jerry needs to get the Muhlenberg project up before any other rental developments go up. Make sense? Of course we don’t need any more rental housing, upscale loft type or otherwise (including a hotel for Veterans). What we need is new leadership and this includes the current and incoming city council, we need economic development that will create real jobs, more than the 45 job that an apartment complex would produce. We need a serious and obtainable plan to combat crime, starting with the replacement of Martin Hellwig. Plainfield is too small to have as much crime as we do. It doesn’t make sense that it can’t be controlled.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think some writers here think that the City Council can make the mayor do whatever they want. That is not true. The Council is in an advise and consent position. Perhaps when the city charter is revised, some things will change to make the mayor more accountable to the council and the citizens.

    I'm glad to see Reid is getting his act together and representing the people who put him in office and not doing Sharon and Jerry's bid. They don't represent us and their actions show it. Let's hope that some good things can happen before Sharon is voted out, but we still have hope for the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't fully buy the advise and consent part. They have the power of the budget (shown with their unilateral restoration of library funds) and they vote to approve city management personnel. If they wanted to act they could find a way. Not saying they would win - but you don't get anywhere if you only whine and complain about what others aren't doing. I have little faith in any of them to even move the ball 5 yards down the field - maybe cause they can't get practice time on the field from dept of recreation or whatever that bloated dept they have issues with but continue to fund and then complain about is called. They are looking like all hat and no cattle.

      Delete
  5. Blame it on staff no longer there ... how well thought out, because the last Republican mayor was many, many moons ago; and we all know that a continued solid Democratic Council & Mayor is what this town needs !!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Isn't this the same Mohammad who stood at every council meeting professing his desire to bring the children of Plainfield together to play together? Isn't this the same Mohammad who tried to chase the 5-6 year old QCBL tee ballers off the field earlier in the baseball season? Isn't this the same Mohammad who defends the mayor at every chance he gets? Isn't this the same Mohammad who is directed by the superintendent of recreation to do all the public speaking on his behalf? There will be no economic development as long as the mayor is focused on allowing the harassment of QCBL. Her time is spent figuring out how in the world is she going to defend this crap. But don't worry she will and then she'll come up with another proposal perhaps she'll only offer QCBL just one day a week, hoping they'll just go away.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes imagine how awful this City would be if a scroundel like Jon Bramnick was back on the Council and cared about Public Safety & a Good Tax Base !!! Things would be so much ... oh wait, that might actually be a good thing.

    ReplyDelete
  8. it's funny when muhammad was a paid seasonal employee he was all about the kids and getting along, now that the cash stopped he's stopped pretending and can now be his true self i.e., rude, loud and obnoxious to put it mildly. why was he at the field on monday anyway? weren't those the only days the mayor so generously offered to qcbl to play ball? so what reason did he have to be there other than to cause trouble? while qcbl is trying to teach their players sportsmanship and foster and display good citizenship with outside towns
    and for them to witness the type of behavior displayed by muhammad should be an embarrassment to the all of the residents of plainfield especially the mayor since he seems to be representing her and the rec director. i don't know what can be done about someone who is not a city employee yet continues to act as if he has some type of authority to show up and show out but i certainly hope someone addresses this situation soon before the city finds themselves in yet another legal situation that the city needs to endure.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Mr. Muhammad should go take care of his family and leave other families alone. he has done all the yelling and screaming at the council on behalf of Dave & the mayor, but I see they didn't keep his check coming in, now maybe Dave needs to be hit in the pocket as well, it didn't teach Mr. Muhammad anything but it might teach Dave that he is not the great oz and will not continue to treat this city as if it's his personal bank account.

    ReplyDelete
  10. we can build all the lofts that we want, nobody will come into plainfield to live in them. help make the school better, make it a community affair. if the schools continue failling there be no economic growth in painfield. you will think the Campbell,s will capitalize on this since they are in the real estate buisiness.

    ReplyDelete