At a special meeting Thursday, the City Council voted to use
unspent funds from the six-month 2011 “transition year” budget to help plug an
unforeseen hole in the 2012 budget.
After holding budget deliberations since April 12, the
council found out last week that a state review of the budget found errors and
omissions totaling about $2 million.
The 2011 funds totaling $905,000 will be added to surplus
and $500,000 will be used for tax relief. Other more controversial proposals,
such as making major cuts to the corporation counsel’s office and eliminating
the new public information officer’s job will be taken up at a special meeting
on June 6.
The council’s Finance and Administration Committee also
recommended adding $70,000 to the Plainfield Public Library’s $1,556,338
budget, countering Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs’ call to cut funding by 40
percent to the minimum state requirement for the library.
The meeting included a report from the Citizens’ Budget
Advisory Committee and a line-by-line report from the Finance and
Administration Committee on other issues related to the budget shortfall.
The CBAC report, given by Chairman Charles McRae, called for
reductions to the $752,000 Recreation budget, transition of Bilingual Day Care and
other social service programs to outside agencies, outsourcing of property code
inspections and reduction of the corporation counsel to part-time.
The group faulted the Recreation Division for not providing “a
complete and verifiable accounting” of costs for its programs, for serving only
about 5 percent of the city’s population and for not documenting details of how
$400,000 for seasonal workers was allocated. The committee called for a total
review of the Office of Economic Development, saying it “continues not to be
able to provide sustained improvements in the city’s economy.”
Council members and Acting City Administrator Eric Jackson thanked
the committee for its work since early April, when budget deliberations began.
Members this year were Jaclynne Callands, Jeanette Criscione, Lisa
Cright-Bryant, Delois Dameron, Robert Darden, Will Gill, Jan Massey and McRae.
In response to both the CBAC and Finance Committee’s calls
to cut staffing in the Corporation Counsel’s office, City Solicitor David
Minchello gave an impassioned defense against reductions.
Minchello, speaking in the absence of Corporation Counsel
Dan Williamson, said the in-house legal staff not only handles litigation, but
must give advice daily to city officials on various matters. In addition, the office
must review OPRA requests, conduct hearings on employee disciplinary matters,
check bid specifications, monitor police depositions and handle defense of
hundreds of ongoing legal cases.
“This city is big business,” Minchello said. As a big
business, it requires full staffing.”
Several years ago, the city switched from a part-time
corporation counsel to one who serves full-time with two special counsels
in-house and other attorneys hired as needed. Councilwoman Rebecca Williams
asked Jackson
to research how many cities of similar size have a full-time corporation
counsel, which he promised to do by Monday. Councilman William Reid wanted a
further analysis of the types of caseloads comparable cities have, but Jackson said that would
take much longer.
Councilman Cory Storch said he understands the discomfort of
the administration over such a proposed change, but he said, “Our city is
afraid of change.”
Storch also brought up the city charter’s provision that the corporation counsel must serve both
the mayor and council, which became a problem last year during an investigation
into use of city funds for a 2010 radio broadcast on gang violence. Each side
ended up getting its own attorney and now that the mayor is suing the council
over the outcome of the investigation, the governing body added $50,000 to its
own budget for independent legal representation.
Minchello insisted that from his years of working with the
office, it could not function with a reduced staff.
“I know the work that’s out there,” he said.
Storch asked why Williamson was not at the meeting and Jackson said he had asked
to leave early on personal business Thursday.
Williamson is also leaving the administration July 1 to
become executive director of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority and
that transition in part prompted the call the reorder the legal staff.
When the subject turned to the recently created IT and Media
Division, some council members were surprised to find out the new public
officer was now reporting directly to City Administrator Eric Berry. The PIO
had been reporting directly to the mayor in violation of the city’s special
charter, which mandates three departments over all city divisions. The council
passed an ordinance creating the Division of Information Technology in 2010 and
when the PIO was hired this year, he was placed in that division.
Williams called the new arrangement “a violation of the city
charter” and said, “The city administrator should be here.” (Berry is on vacation.) She also questioned
why the city was advertising for nine more people to join the division. Al Restaino director of the Department of
Administration, Finance, Health & Social Services under which the new
division was also placed, said the idea was to get a “pool” of media
technicians from which to draw as needed.
The council’s Finance Committee suggested eliminating both
the PIO and an assistant, along with overtime in Media & Communications, to
save $105,000.
The council will meet at 7 p.m. on June 6 in City Hall
Library to vote on budget amendments reflecting some or all of the changes
discussed Thursday. Final passage of the budget is expected to take place on June 18.
--Bernice
This administration should be hiring people who know how to bring money into the City and NOT political hacks who do nothing but suck it out. If the administration would do there job correctly we would not need so many attorneys to clean up the Mayor's mess.
ReplyDeleteThat is exactly the point. Thank you!
ReplyDelete