Wednesday, November 27, 2013

Council Backs Mapp on Staff Initiatives

Explanations from Mayor-elect Adrian Mapp turned the Nov. 12 tide of opposition to concurrence Tuesday as his City Council colleagues approved a salary increase for chief financial officer as well as creation of the title "chief of staff" and a salary range to go with it.

The new salary range of up to $155,000 for the chief financial officer passed 6-0 after Mapp, a CFO himself in another municipality, had Personnel Director Karen Dabney come to the table to discuss salary ranges for the title. Dabney cited a range of $168,088 to $120,000, with an average of $135,000. The information countered objections by resident Alan Goldstein, who did his own survey and found the range excessive.

Before the vote, Mapp called Plainfield a complex city with many challenges that needs a "highly skilled, highly competent" CFO.

"This position will more than pay for itself," he said.

Council members Cory Storch, Vera Greaves, Mapp and President Bridget Rivers were present in City Hall Library and Rebecca Williams, Tracey Brown and William Reid took part by speakerphone, although Reid's line in South Carolina dropped out early. The salary ordinance passed, 6-0, a pattern that continued with establishment of the title of chief of staff and passage of a salary band for that title of $60,000 to $95,000.

Mapp's pitch for the chief of staff was based on what he said was the need for someone to interface with all levels of government.on the city's behalf. He gave a personal anecdote regarding his ability to get his mortgage re-financed in a time of dire need only after he sought help from a representative in Washington.

"The next day, I got a call from the president of Bank of America," he said.

Mapp told his colleagues he needed their support for the title, which was not the same as city administrator.

"You can call it any name - I chose to call it 'chief of staff,' " he said.

Brown said, "I'm glad Mayor-elect Mapp cleared that up, because we had some serious concerns."

On Nov. 12, .the measure had failed 4-3 and the salary band ordinance was then moot. Both passed,  6-0, on Tuesday.

The budget transfer resolution that went off the rails on Nov. 12 passed, as several police officers looked on. The sticking point on Nov. 12 was initially $131,091 for controversial police promotions by lame duck Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs. The council ended up funding only $51,000 in Recreation shortfalls out of the 17-item, $1.1 million transfer request. On Tuesday, Acting City Administrator Al Restaino briefly answered residents' questions about some of the budget transfers and Mapp explained why he was dropping his objections to it.

Besides declaring the handover of $163,085 in FEMA funds to the PMUA "improper," Mapp cited "irresponsible behavior " of the outgoing mayor in making the promotions. But he said if the budget transfers were not made, the city would go into the 2014 budget year with the $1 million shortfall as a "deferred charge."

"I will not allow anything to get in my way of being a successful mayor," He said. "It pains me that the mayor has put us where we are."

But he added, "My concern is not about being right, it is about being successful."

Williams objected Tuesday to an additional $45,000 for the Media budget line. Restaino chalked it up to coverage of numerous city events, but said he has now "streamlined" the schedule. The transfers passed, 5-2, with Williams and Storch voting "no."

The final item on the special meeting agenda was conveyance of city-owned land to the Housing Authority, but Corporation Counsel David Minchello deemed the ordinance "not legal" and in need of further review. He said city redevelopment counsel Robert Renaud concurred.

First, he said, the ordinance read "like an attempt to enter into a redevelopment agreement," but it referred to an area not designated for redevelopment. Secondly, terms, such as a price for the turnover, were lacking.

Wendy Monahan, an attorney for developer Cecil Sanders, said the property was being conveyed to the Housing Authority.

"In my legal opinion, there is nothing illegal about this ordinance," she said.

But the council sided with Minchello and voted to table the ordinance.

In public comment, Goldstein raised several potential conflicts of interest regarding various public officials in connection with the proposed ordinance and said, "None of this is on the table."

Randall Wood, director of the Housing Authority of Plainfield, objected to the characterization and said anyone on his board with a potential conflict "always recused themselves."

Minchello said his reasons for advising the council had nothing to do with Goldstein's comments, but were "purely related to process."

For background on the proposal to build on the city-owned sites, click here.

The next City Council meeting is an agenda-fixing session on Dec. 2, followed by a regular meeting on Dec. 9.

--Bernice

12 comments:

  1. Business as usual. Top heavy in the administration same with the police. Keep voting with the Dems and soon there will be know one to pay for their unwise decisions.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I believe Ms. Dabney did a good job cherry-picking the few salaries she was able to cite in order to provide a higher average than what is a true average. As I said last night, I have no problem with raising the upper end of the range, but we ought to be realistic and hold back from assuming platinum tastes. Using wealthy towns such as Millburn and Cranford as examples did not prove the point.

    My comments regarding conflicts of interest were directed primarily to the PMUA officials involved in the proposed real estate deal, as well as the Council president who should have disclosed her relationship with a HAP board member and recused herself from the deliberations, regardless of Mr. Minchello's point which had no bearing on the conflict issue.

    As for the HAP conflict, which I did not get into, it has nothing to do with recusal. HAP's problem is that it joined with a private development proposal, thereby shutting out other potential development groups that may have had an interest in upgrading the property. This violated the Fair and Equal Treatment clause of the City's Code of Ethics (MC 11:17-3): "No official or employee shall grant or make available to any person any consideration, treatment, advantage or favor beyond that which it is the general practice to grant or make available to the public at large." If the City and the Housing Authority determined to put housing on this property, then enter into a memorandum of understanding between the two and issue an RFP available to all interested parties.

    It was business as usual last night in most respects.



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Alan, you should start your own blog with your information. This cannot happen. Thank you for your good work.

      Delete
    2. Isn't Dunn moving? Can he get our of Plainfield now?

      Delete
  3. It looks like our new Mayor will spend our money frivolously to get what he wants. As a supporter I am sorry to hear that this.

    This seems to be a pattern with him personally too. This is not gossip, it has been reported, and he has admitted on the record that his personal finances were in disarray at one point too.

    The pundits are correct when they criticize us for voting for the party line. Somehow as a society we must stop spending more then we make - how can we when our leaders are such poor examples.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. In fairness, Mapp stated Tuesday that he was unemployed for two years, three months and nine days and decided to pay his mortgage rather than unsecured bills. He said this in the context of his remarks about trying to get his mortgage refinanced.
      If when you say it has been "reported," you are referring to dissemination of his personal situation by flyers in a campaign, some felt it was underhanded and even cruel to expose him that way. Mapp explained his situation himself in a blog post and refused to be hurt by those who would make political hay out of his misfortune.
      http://adrianmapp.blogspot.com/2011/06/creator-will-smile-on-me.html

      Delete
    2. and we all know it was those crafty Republicans who "disseminated" that information about his finances.. poor choice in political allegiances now for the Mayor to be..

      Delete
    3. Let me tell you 9:35am. If it were not for Councilman Mapp, your taxes would be 100% more. He does not spend money frivolously, and in fact, is rather conservative in how he spends his money.

      If you want frivolous, look at this mayor. You spend 18K paying for her personal lawyer. It was either that or the city (you) being sued. That's frivolous.

      Delete
    4. And let me tell you 11:32pm. You're reaching here. How he spends his money is a lot different than how he will spend our money. As it was, the 18K you mention was only a fraction of the 100K, solving nothing
      and basically ending nowhere. Tuesday he went along with the police promotions which will cost big bucks as time goes by and makes the division more top heavy and less able to keep cops on the street. I'll give him a chance to show he's not a spendthrift, but I really don't expect miracles. Without Sharon to parry, he may turn out to be more like a king with no clothes.

      Delete
  4. give the gossip a rest people its never good enough.

    ReplyDelete
  5. It is a shame that everyone became a puppet and voted for more and more top heavy, jobs. Mapp will be a new Mayor. But the spending spree and frisking of taxpayers is old news. He is not a New Democrat. He is a very Old Democrat.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Way to go Bernice with your defence of Mapp. Are you the new spokesperson for Mapp? Sure seems that way....

    ReplyDelete