Tuesday, January 11, 2011

Rec Commission Plan Stirs Dissent

Despite objections from the mayor, two council members and outspoken supporters of Recreation Superintendent Dave Wynn, an ordinance to establish a Recreation Commission will be on the agenda Jan. 18.

The proposed seven-member commission would be responsible for recreation programming and would set a budget to pay for it. Commissioners would appoint a “recreation coordinator” and recommend his or her salary to the mayor and council. Other recreation staff as needed could also be appointed by the commission. At present, the city has a Recreation Advisory Committee that would become the initial members of the commission, if the legislation passes.

Councilman William Reid blasted the plan as creating a new bureaucracy and said there had been “no complaints” about the Recreation Division. He also objected to having a group of residents given the powers outlined in the ordinance.

“It does look like we are picking on the Recreation Department,” Councilwoman Bridget Rivers said.

When new Councilwoman Rebecca Williams spoke in favor of the commission and said only “a paltry number of children” were being served by the city’s recreation programs, Reid repeatedly said she was giving “”false numbers.”

Councilman Cory Storch said he supported formation of the commission, “especially because of all the concerns you heard over last year.”

“I know we could serve a lot more kids,” he said.

As Plaintalker has reported, the Queen City Baseball League began complaining about treatment of its volunteer program in 2009 and the ensuing wrangle between the league and supporters of Wynn continued throughout 2010. The Recreation Advisory Committee was reactivated in part to sort out and possibly resolve the issues. Comments Monday reflected a continuance of widely opposing views on how well the Recreation Division is functioning.

Acting City Administrator Dan Williamson, who served as corporation counsel until City Administrator Bibi Taylor recently went out on maternity leave, said Monday, “The history of the administration’s objections (to a commission) is pretty clear,” though he said he recognized that the council had the votes to pass it. He said the proposal takes away authority from the mayor.

“I don’t know what the answer is, but we believe the answer is not to take away the mayor’s authority and stock the commission with the committee,” he said.

Mayor Sharon Robinson-Briggs then voiced a number of objections, starting with the council’s budget amendment that shifted funds from Wynn’s salary line and put it in expenses for seasonal workers.

“Who’s going to run the programs?” she asked. “Volunteers can’t do that for the city of Plainfield. We do not need another layer of bureaucracy.”

Robinson-Briggs said if the legislation passed, she would “like to veto it.”

Council President Annie McWilliams said the ordinance would take two months to pass and the mayor could veto it, the council could override the veto.

Acting Corporation Counsel James Ventantonio questioned whether the proposal was not just “change for change’s sake,” uprooting the committee to make way for the commission. But Councilman Adrian Mapp defended the proposal as “giving structure” to recreation operations. He said the council had no desire to take authority away form the mayor, but was seeking to “ensure there is continuity” in running programs.

Williamson called on the council to allow the Recreation Division to operate, but McWilliams said, “It is my understanding that Recreation is unable to operate – what is it, it can or cannot?”

When McWilliams said she heard the mayor say Recreation could not operate, the mayor snapped back the she did not say that. Mapp then prodded the mayor on what she said , but the mayor responded that the “resolution” was not in compliance with the city’s special charter.

“You should be asking yourselves why you want to go to a commission rather than a committee,” she said, and told Mapp, “It is illegal – it is not in line with the charter.”

The mayor and Mapp, who were rivals in the June 2009 mayoral primary, then had an exchange in which she told Mapp, “Stop campaigning on the taxpayer’s dime.”

McWilliams reminded all parties that they have to see each other around the city, in church and elsewhere and called for respect. Mapp said he was just trying to get the mayor to bring the discussion to a close, and also held out the need for civility.

When McWilliams asked for a consensus on putting the ordinance on the Jan. 18 agenda for a vote on first reading, Reid and Rivers said no, but Storch, Mapp, Williams and McWilliams agreed to put it on.

In the public comment portion of the meeting, two supporters of Wynn lashed out at the council members and at Recreation Committee Chairman Dwayne Wilkins, who was in the audience.

Resident Dan Morgan, who is on the Recreation Advisory Committee, said a commission is unneeded and Wynn has a lot of support. He accused Storch of “trying to be slick” in commenting on the budget amendments and told Mapp, “You can smirk all you want.”

“Cory, I’m surprised at you,” Morgan said. “I thought you was on the up-and-up.”

Morgan alluded to “Sleepy Hollow” and the Second Ward that Storch represents and said, “It’s a vendetta against the other part of town.”

As McWilliams tried to invoke the rules for public comment, Morgan said, “You make it up as you go along,” and the mayor laughed.

Roland Muhammad, another Wynn supporter, said he missed the annual reorganization where he heard there was talk of unity, “But I don’t see it.”

“I see a divided city,” he said. “New Dems, old Dems. I live in the Fourth Ward. I represent the poor. This is our city,” he said, shaking a fist at Storch. “Look what happened in Washington. You act like Republicans to me.”

“You’re a joke,” Muhammad said to Storch, continuing his remarks and growing louder.

Finally McWilliams cautioned him, “Don’t yell,” but Muhammad said, “That’s my voice.

Again turning to Wilkins, he said, “I’m not afraid of the Fourth Ward, but I’m a little afraid of the Second.”

To Queen City Baseball League leader Karen Glencamp Daniel, he said, “My war is not with you.”

Muhammad went on to describe his 40-year friendship with Wynn and added, “I say things the mayor can’t say.”

“You’re a public servant,” he said in a final shot at Storch.

As the meeting adjourned at 12:25 a.m., the mayor thanked Muhammad.

--Bernice Paglia

17 comments:

  1. "It does look like we are picking on the Recreation Department,” Councilwoman Bridget Rivers said.

    You would be my first witness at the hearing for Dave Wynn if he files an appeal.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Seriously ???? " Not campaigning on the public dime ?? " LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL.....SHARON YOU ARE JOKE.
    Your pet dog Wynn...a bigger joke because like you, he doesn't sense enough to distance himself from his master.
    He can't run the program in a professional manner despite resolutions demanding he do it. The Mayor won't or can't control him.
    She can scream charter all she wants....the council must do what she won't or can't do.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. If councilman Reid knows of the true numbers of kids that Wynn services, he owes it to the community to show us the numbers.

    Wynn has been asked for the numbers by the council several times and the CBAC. To date, I don't believe any numbers have been delivered.

    He has a $700,000 budget and to the numbers that have been given (not by Wynn - why would he not), only 5% of the children are serviced. So Mr. Reid, where are the numbers?

    Mr. Muhammad should be afraid of the 2nd Ward. The people who live there believe that Plainfield belongs to all of its citizens, not just the 4th ward.

    To my mind, Mr. Muhammad is the most dangerous and detrimental type of person in Planfield. Afraid of change, he brings the city down.

    Does Mr. Muhammad show up at BOE meetings? If not, perhaps he should take his passion and include making sure this city has a good education system. Perhaps then, the poor people in the fourth ward can reach their potential, and not be poor.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Please take the mayor's authority away! Please!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Roland Muhammad, another Wynn supporter, said he missed the annual reorganization where he heard there was talk of unity, “But I don’t see it.”

    Mr. Muhammad said

    -where he heard there was talk of unity, “But I don’t see it.”

    “I see a divided city,” ...I live in the Fourth Ward. I represent the poor. This is our city,” he said, shaking a fist at Storch.

    Is Mr. Muhammad suggesting that he is trying to unify this city? I certainly hope not.

    He doesn't see it because he doesn't either believe it or know what it means.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Bernice, to my mind, this type of rhetoric is what brings on the violence that erupted in Tuscon. Talking about wards only brings on division. There is no conversation, only pointing fingers, and in many cases, distortion of the truth.

    I think that people should be elected to office once only. After they serve their term they are done. No hidden agendas, no contracts to parse out, no higher goal. Not reality, but until the people in politics really do make decisions on what is best for the community,rather than how they can retain power, Tuscon might be repeated. Hopefully we have learned our lesson.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Mr. Reid has been kissing Sharon's you know what for so long. Can't we get rid of Reid and Sharon? I guess Mr. Reid wasn't paying attention to the unprofessional and careless behavior of Wynn over the past several years. He has to go and someone with an ounce of shame and honesty needs to take his job. Let's do the same to Sharon too.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Youth Programs? I think this is all about patronage and trying to win friends and influence neighbors. Another pile of cash hanging about. Not so much youth and recreation. Take that out of the mix and Dave Wynnn would probably do a decent job.

    ReplyDelete
  10. "'This is our city,' he (Mr Muhammad) said, shaking a fist at Storch."

    Yep, you're right, Mr Muhammad, it is your city. You wanted it that way and you got it. Eventually the remaining whites will move away, even from the second ward. Who will you blame then?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Mr. Muhammad, the 4th ward may be your city. The rest of us live in Plainfield and want, expect and have better. Perhaps you should join the rest of the city. It is a great place to live.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Bottom-line, I care about the youth we serve and facts. It's important that we have programs to serve our kids in town, give them something to do. The more people who can help in this process, the better. For a town the size of Plainfield, and the challenges that are here - we've got to serve our children - more children, provide positive role models and keep them engaged.

    I wanted to clarify two points...

    1) Superintendent Wynn did present a report with participation in the numbers. The report was distributed to David Brown and City Council on November 22nd. I am sure they are in public records.

    2) I don't know that Mr. Muhammed was talking to me or not, so I don't quite know what to make about that.

    Bottom line is, we need to serve our kids. I've coached a bunch of kids from all wards for both the city and non profit organizations. Help is needed.

    Most everyone on the Plainfield Recreation Advisory Committee are coaches who volunteer their time with kids or have school aged children. We want all kids to be served in the best way possible.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I don't know which is worse to attack a person who speaks out as racist or to post the vitriolic attacks. I hope he sues both the owner of this blog and those who attacked his character. He is not a public elected official. He is a resident of this city that had a right to voice his opinion. Challenge his ideas and ideals but NO ONE has the right to make such harsh and cruel accusations. I really hope he sues you all.

    ReplyDelete
  14. the numbers that Dave Wynn presented to the council in November at the budget hearings about how many kids the Recreation Department served were even less than what Councilwoman Williams said. Those were his numbers,which makes it even worse.

    ReplyDelete
  15. To 6:30pm - As he has a right to voice is opinion, so do the rest of us. If someone feels he is a racist, that his their opinion - like it or not. Just like Mr. Muhammad said "I represent the poor. This is our city. I don't like it, but he has a right to say it.

    I would like to give another opinion of these men. They are not the type of person I would want my children to be around or learn from. We have them making threats and shaking fists. They have nothing of substance to say - (give me numbers, give me facts. To date, we still have not seen any numbers that support more than 5% of the children being serviced by 700K budget.)

    I want my children to be around people of tolerance, and those who know how to respect all people, regardless of their views. That is what America is about - being able to discuss differing opinions respectfully. It appears some have not learned that lession.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Reid doesn't want the added bureaucracy yet everything that he votes in the affirmative for creates an added layer of government. With the number of kids we have in this city, we don't have adequate programs or fields. I'm not sure if you can blame Wynn but the puppetmasters (Briggs and Green) won't take any of the blame. How can someone who has been elected for over 25 years without improving the city continue to be elected? HANDOUTS!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Bernice,

    Do you know if the meeting tapes are edited before they are televised? It seems that some parts are missing but I guess it doesn't matter that much since you can hardly hear it.

    ReplyDelete