In a split vote, the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority's board of commissioners has agreed to settle with two former top executives for $725,000, down from the $1.2 million they initially sought in compensation claims.
The settlement was approved late Tuesday night. Plaintalker obtained a copy of the resolution, which is to be signed in “mid-January,” according to a notation on the OPRA receipt. Payment hinges on certification of available funds by the authority’s chief finance officer, James Perry, but Chairman Harold Mitchell said Friday he voted "no" because the amount could not be certified. A call to Perry was not immediately returned Friday afternoon.
Former Executive Director Eric Watson had already received severance amounts of $151,000 and Assistant Executive Director David Ervin had received $124,000 after resigning in March 2011.After months of arbitration over additional claims, lawyers for the pair made a settlement demand in November of an additional $750,000 for Watson and $300,000 for Ervin, along with legal fees of $80,200 and arbitration costs of $15,500.
In making the demand, attorneys for the pair cited the continuing costs of arbitration and the uncertainty of the outcome of arbitration hearings, as well as the pair’s “significant contributions” to development and growth of the authority.
At Tuesday’s meeting, the PMUA’s board of commissioners voted to settle for an additional $450,000 for Watson and $275,000 for Ervin. Commissioners Alex Toliver and Malcolm Dunn and alternate Cecil H. Sanders Jr. voted “yes,” while Mitchell and Commissioner Carol Brokaw voted “no.” Commissioner Tracey Brown was absent.
Between the initial payments and the settlement, Mitchell said, "It's almost a million dollars. Carol and I didn't agree on the amount."
The agreement calls for equal payments annually for four years, pending certification of the availability of funds by the chief finance officer.
Watson and Ervin, who along with the late Lou Jones were founding executives of the authority, resigned after 15 years of service. All three had been administrators in the city’s Department of Public Works. The new authority took over solid waste services that had previously been furnished by private haulers contracting with property owners. It also took charge of sewer services that had been provided by the city’s sewer utility.
The authority grew to be the fifth largest employer in the city, but came under fire from a ratepayers’ group after steep increases in 2009. The group uncovered and made public extensive tabs for travel and business lunches incurred by PMUA executives and actively encouraged property owners to “opt out” of the PMUA for trash pickup. The group maintains a web site, DumpPMUA, that continues to monitor authority costs.
Besides its troubles with ratepayers, the authority has been at loggerheads with the City Council over its operations and the governing body last year formed a PMUA Task Force to examine the authority’s workings and make recommendations.
Meanwhile, new Executive Director Duane Young has promised more transparency and cooperation with the City Council and ratepayers, adding much more public information to the web site and more convenience to customers. At a rate hearing in December, the authority announced there would be no rate increase for solid waste rates in 2012 and a 2.6 reduction in sewer rates.
--Bernice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
PMUA has taken us to the cleaners, and that my friends is the main reason for its existence.
ReplyDeleteBow down to the bureaucracy. It's only money.
Special thanks to the two new commissioners, Dunn and Sanders. The rip-off continues and they will suck us dry.
This has got to be a joke!
ReplyDeleteSo let me see if I got this straight. The two newly appointed PMUA Commissioners voted to INCREASE the severance package of the two top PMUA Executives that QUIT, to ONE MILLION DOLLARS, Did I get that right , they quit, and they get 1 MIL, NICE!
ReplyDeleteWhat will that do to our rates? YIKES!
Are these the two new PMUA Commissioners offered up by the Mayor and supported by Jerry Green, who were recently put on the board by ADRIAN MAPP's deciding vote? The same Adrian Mapp whose fellow New Democrats voted against these "status quo" appointments? Yep, they voted no, and Adrian voted YES!
Is this the same Adrian Mapp who posted elections results at Jerry Green's campaign headquarters the night the Assemblyman won re-election in November? Is this the same 'I need to run on Jerry's line to get re-elected to council and become mayor' Adrian Mapp? Is this the same Adrian Mapp who wanted to dissolve the PMUA because of the cronyism, but voted for new PMUA Commissioner Malcolm Dunn who happens to be an influential resident in his voting ward and has a long history of ties to Jerry Green?
Now remember Plainfielders this is the same Adrian Mapp that has been telling us for years that what's wrong with Plainfield is. . . Jerry Green.
Sadly it looks like we have once again been sold out Plainfielders as it looks like Adrian Mapp bought a copy of Jerry's play book.
Say it isn't so Adrian.
Could somebody put the needle back on the record...I like the way the new song sounds a lot like the old one...Million here, million there...Remember, like Adrian Mapp and Cory Storch said...VOTE STRAIGHT DOWN THE PARTY LINE!! It's all about Barack Obama...not some petty million dollars at the PMUA...
ReplyDeleteIf you will recall, the two executives RESIGNED their post earlier this year. Yet, the PMUA commissioners have found a way to pay each of them more than four years pay. If you haven't gotten involved, Plainfielders need you now more than ever. Don't simply read this and think someone else will write. There is real power in numbers. We are requesting that you call and write the governor ASAP. He can veto the minutes and void this settlement. We are also asking you to contact your council members and tell them Enough is Enough! It's time that the council disband the PMUA and put these services out to competitive bid. It is estimated that competitive bid will save
ReplyDeletePlainfield taxpayers more than $6 million per year while providing the
same level of service.
The address, phone number, and governor's fax number are listed at the end of this message. Please be advised that government offices are closed on Monday in Honor of MLK.
Thank you in advance for your help.
Philip
DumpPMUA.com
Office of the Governor
PO Box 001
Trenton, NJ 08625
Phone: 609-292-6000
Fax: 609-292-3454
Outrageous and deeply offensive to rate payers, many of whom have been struggling with PMUA rates for years. This should have been arbitrated, in my layperson's view, although I feel that these individuals (Watson and Ervin) should have received NOTHING additional, since they resigned. I voted against the appointments of Dunn and Sanders, as I felt that the organization needed new blood--not recycling, and certainly not in the form of two old business partners. I know that there are residents who want to serve, but the mayor only puts up people in her personal sphere. That the beginning of Dunn and Sanders's respective tenures on the PMUA should be marked by this egregious and outrageous payoff suggests to me that we will be in for more of the same.
ReplyDeleteRebecca
Rebecca, I hope that you (as a resident) will join us in writing to the Governor, asking for a veto of the minutes of the meeting and a voiding of the settlement.
ReplyDeleteSince the New Democrats voted these bums into office, what exactly is "New" about the New Democrats?
ReplyDeleteBernice, you neglect to mention who voted for the new commissioners into office. Was that intentional?
ReplyDelete@06:59 a.m.: I stated the vote breakdown at the time that it happened:
ReplyDeletehttp://ptalker2.blogspot.com/2011/11/plainfield-municipal-utilities.html
Why do you think it was "neglect" to mention it now?
Rebecca.... I just want to thank you for your disloyalty and back door politicing... By tour actions coupled with your co conspiritors...You know who they are!!!
ReplyDeleteManaged to steal or mis appropriate or abscound with our money (tax payers of Plainfield)...to the tune of $21,500.00 in order to get a return of $200.00....
I hope that none of the funds ends up in any of your campaign coffers...RMEMBER BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!!!!
This is the caliber of thinking that keeps Plainfield in the dumper - intimidation, misdirection and thuggishness. "Peace" indeed.
DeleteDear Bernice
ReplyDeleteAs a Business woman here in Plainfield and highly respected would you spend $22,000.00 to get back %200.00?
I guess that you are still comtemplsting
ReplyDeleteWhat is there to think about????
Serioiusly. I would like it to be made clear that since you have not responded that you woould in fact take tax payer dollars to go after some one you do not like!!!
Nothing beats a woman's SCORN!!!hahahaha
Another hypothetical question
Would you sell the sewr rights to a private concern for 19 million when in fact it was producing 21million dollars yearly???
Please don't think too hard
Wow it is taking you too long to respond to me
ReplyDeletePlease dont think too hard... I have another
math problem that you may be able to solve since this one is taking you so long...Hahahah
Would you sell an asset which is producing 21 million USD dollars yearly for 19million?
Plaese respond