Thursday, April 5, 2012

Following the Action at Council Meetings


Councilman William Reid is the 2012 chairman of the Committee of the Whole, which means he leads the discussion at agenda-fixing sessions. Having viewed some sessions on television, Reid said he realized the viewer couldn't tell what was going on, as agenda items were often referred to by alphabetical designations rather than content. So a viewer might hear, "Is everybody OK with item A?" and not have any idea what the council was considering. Reid decided he was going to read out the title of every item.

Monday's agenda had a total of 36 proposed resolutions and seven ordinances. But first the council had several discussion items, reports of committees and public comment. By the time the council got around to considering the resolutions and ordinances, it was after 10 p.m. Council President Adrian Mapp told Reid he didn't have to read every title, but Reid said after he got FiOS, he saw the council meetings and that's when he decided that people couldn't tell what the council was considering.

Plaintalker has long felt that meetings were hard to follow, even for those sitting in City Hall Library or Municipal Court with a copy of the agenda in hand. There is a binder with the text of each resolution and ordinance on hand at the meetings, but the best bet for anyone who wants to understand the proposed legislation is to review it ahead of time, at the Plainfield Public Library on the Saturday before the meeting or in the City Clerk's office on Monday before the meeting. That is where the details emerge, and residents including bloggers with questions or concerns can then raise them during public comment.

For example, Reid read item W: "Approve authorization to execute an access agreement between the City of Plainfield and the South Second Street Youth Center for the use of city-owned property located at Block 120 Lot 4.01 commonly known as 208-222 Lee Place to cultivate a community garden." This site is actually a former dry-cleaning plant that was the subject of a brownfields remediation to remove hazardous materials.  Someone who knew the details raised a concern about use of the site and was told the garden plots will be raised beds that will hold fresh soil. The item will be up for a vote next Monday and anyone else with concerns can speak in public comment before the vote.

Items Z through Z2 all  pertained to liens for boarding or cleanup of properties, and Z3 through Z9 were all escrow refunds. They could have been grouped as was the custom in the past, but Reid read out each one.

And then there was this gem of obscurity among ordinances up for first reading next Monday: "Bond 1254 - Bond Ordinance amending Section 3 of Bond Ordinance No. 1245 adopted September 15, 2008 as amended by Bond Ordinance No. 1246 adopted July 20, 2009 to amend the project description for said purpose to be undertaken in and by the City of Plainfield, in the County of Union, State of New Jersey."

Well, that is actually a rollover of $6.3 million to fund road repairs first proposed in 2008. Good news, but who knew from the title?

However worthy Reid's intention, there is still a gap of comprehension that can only be filled by knowing the details. This used to be one of the functions of reporters, but since most news organizations have moved away from covering municipal government, that leaves it up to others to flesh out the meaning of important legislation. Sometimes council members themselves will ask the administration to explain exactly what they are being asked to approve, including full costs and other implications that are not apparent from the title alone. Citizen watchdogs and bloggers also try to bring out ramifications of new legislation, and those who might be affected may do the same by speaking out before a vote.

So does reading out each title help? Plaintalker is interested in the opinions of viewers of council meetings as well as those who attend in person. How do you follow the action?

--Bernice

9 comments:

  1. As you have pointed out, reading the titles does not really help and it certainly slows things down. For a person to seriously follow on cable the council meetings, school board or whichever group, there should be easy and permanent access via the city website to the same binder material that is publicly displayed pre-meeting. In 2012 it's pretty anachronistic to expect someone to hie themselves down to the library, especially when it's closed Friday and Saturday nights and all day Sunday.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Is there no institutional memory in City Hall? Converting the Lee Place property (which is in the 197 Property Redevelopment Plan for residential use) into a community garden puts it in the same position Park Madison was in several years ago that delayed and almost killed its ability to be redeveloped. If the City knowingly uses a parcel for open space purposes it becomes protected by Green Acres regulations and cannot be redeveloped. By the city accepting Green Acres funds -- even if they don't spend it on the actual site -- you trigger this regulation. The Park Madison property was saved only through special legislation at the State House and hefty legal fees. The City did the same thing building the vest pocket park on Front St just west of the Tepper's Building -- this parcel was designated for commercial redevelopment.
    Another thing that may be an issue -- I believe that the Lee Place property has EPA funds for haz mat investigation and possibly cleanup. This may have been granted with the expectation that the site will be redeveloped.
    Maybe the Redevelopment Plan has been changed since my time and this site is now considered officially for open space? If not just know that open space uses cannot be considered stop gap measures without consequences.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think this is only temporary and will be monitored. The goal is to have the site redeveloped eventually for residential use.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I hesitate commenting on your meetings because I am not familiar with Plainfield's procedures (or Robert's Rules, for that matter) but do believe that people should have some idea as to pending legislation.

    In the town where I live, agendas is available for review for both Agenda and Regular Council meetings at the meeting itself. Titles to ordinances are read, and there is a discussion at the Agenda meeting. One might have to get copies of more-involved items like the budget at Town Hall. The public can ask questions at the Agenda meeting - votes generally take place at the Regular Council meeting a week later (best to ask your questions at the Agenda meeting - the Regular meeting is opened to the public at the end).

    The single most important thing to remember is that, while you don't know everything, neither do your representatives and they should...and they answer to you (not the other way around). Reasonable questions should get reasonable answers - don't be afraid to ask and poke around.

    And, before I forget, some of the items most impacting on municipalities occur off to the side (PMUA in Plainfield, Planning Board with us) - if at all possible (and from all I have read it is not easy) attend these meetings as well (they are open to the public) and ask your questions. Better to light a candle...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Pat you are correct. Lee Place is slated for residential development and as such is going to be cleaned to residential standard. Residential cleanup standards are higher than that of open space. The City is notorious for making decisions and then trying to change policy midstream. This type of policy gets the City in hot water with Federal and State agencies providing the funding for Brownfield sites.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Plainfield only knows residential. It is the most business unfriendly town I have ever seen, unless you are connected as was the case with the Park Madison Project. That was Jerry's baby and lets not forget no tax revenue and no usage of the parking deck of the businesses to have their customers use on the weekends. It was stated that the deck could be used and after the fact it was not. When questioned about it was told that it never said that in the written agreement.

    To get back to the question, this and former administrations want a convoluted agenda so the town people cant understand whats going on until its too late.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Its time for the City to put the agenda and all resolutions and supporting documents on the web site. Then one can view it while watching the tv. Only the agenda on the web site is not sufficient.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. City Clerk Abubakar "AJ" Jalloh tells me this is in the works! He already has the City Charter and Municipal Code online and he is working on the supporting documents for council agendas.

      Delete
  8. Bernice -- It doesn't matter if they use that site "temporarily" for open space uses " if the city knowingly uses it for open space or recreational purposes" -- no time period is stipulated -- it still gets protected by Green Acres. The P/M "greening" -- using UEZ funds by the way -- was proposed to enhance the appeal of downtown to attract developers. Even that premise did not protect the site for redevelopment and it took 2 years, thousands of dollars in legal fees, hundreds of staff hours and ultimately state legislation to undue the damage. With this hanging over their heads the city should be more strategic in their decision making and understand the regulations that are out there.

    ReplyDelete