Road conditions, health care and South Avenue reconstruction were among topics at Tuesday's Second Ward Town Meeting in Cook School.
Barely a handful of residents spoke, leaving plenty of time for elected officials to expound at length on chronic city issues. They were able to promise relief soon from rutted roads with passage of three bond ordinances that will provide for repair of 30 roads, but had no immediate cure for the city's loss of acute medical care at the shuttered Muhlenberg Regional Medical Center.
In answer to resident David Cook, Council President Adrian Mapp said the work on South Avenue will be completed over the next couple of months and will include paving of some side streets. The traffic-calming devices known as "bump-outs" were removed last year in preparation of the reconstruction.
Cook asked about the Armory on East Seventh Street and was told the state has finally sold it.
Residents Delois Dameron and Robert Darden talked about car damage due to road conditions, but Dameron also deplored the city's limited ambulance service. She said when she came back to Plainfield in 2005, she was shocked to find out there was only one ambulance, and today there is still only one ambulance. Resident Tony Rucker also questioned the need, saying he recently had to wait 50 minutes for an ambulance after becoming ill from possible food poisoning.
"If anybody's having a heart attack, they're pretty much dead," Rucker said.
Dr. Harold Yood traced the history of ambulance service, saying up until the Korean War, it was provided by the hospital, but after that a group of dedicated volunteers formed the Plainfield Rescue Squad. in response to Councilwoman Rebecca Williams' comment that she understood the city was getting another ambulance provided by the state, Yood said an extra ambulance was not an answer to the city's needs. Without ambulance service and a community critical care facility, he said, "We will never have health care again."
Resident Dottie Gutenkauf said she chairs the Restore Muhlenberg group as well as the Community Advisory Group and passed around clipboards with sign-up sheets for email updates on efforts to regain a hospital in Plainfield.
Among other topics, resident Rosa Winston criticized both the mayor and council for the negative image they give the city by bickering at public meetings. She called the behavior "just shameful" and said, "You need to grow up."
Williams said the council each year adopts rules of order for its meetings and both she and Councilman Cory Storch called on residents to identify specific behaviors that they would like to see improved. Storch called it "a very sensitive issue."
Storch spoke at length about economic development, a topic raised by Rucker, his opponent in the 2011 Second Ward election. Rucker said "nobody knows" what the city's economic development strategy is, but Storch cited a study by a Rutgers team that has now led to hiring the Anglin Group to come up with a comprehensive economic development and growth strategy.
"Let's be honest about it," Storch said. "We do not have a plan right now."
But he said with the Anglin Group bringing together the expertise of the business community, the plan will emerge.
"We will not see results in the near term, but this is what we need to do," he said.
The remaining two Town Meetings are Ward 1, 7 p.m. May 29 at the Senior Center, 400 E. Front St. and Ward 4, 7 p.m.June 26 at Jefferson School. The latter will be a joint meeting with the Housing Authority of Plainfield.
Council members also urged residents to attend budget deliberations. There will be a session 7 p.m. tonight (Thursday, April 19) at the Senior Center's Conference Room. Topics will be budget requests for Public Works, Recreation, Inspections and the offices of the mayor and city administrator.
--Bernice
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
There is also a meeting tonight hosted by the Community Advisory Group at 6:30 City Hall.
ReplyDeleteNot sure why Dottie didn’t send this out to her email list, but any public discussions with city officials concerning Muhlenberg should include the stakeholders in the community. Their agenda is below.
City of Plainfield
Community Advisory Group Agenda
Thursday, April 19, 2012
6:30 p.m. – 7:30 p.m.
City Hall Library
• Call to Order – Roll Call
• JFK-Muhlenberg Campus Annual Self Assessment
• Discussion on Proposal from Solaris
• Discussion Re: Two Potential Buyers
• Open Discussion & Updates
• Adjourned
Thanks for posting.
Robin Bright
Any reason why a family member couldn't take you to the hospital or a taxi?
ReplyDeleteAfter all it was only food poisoning why tie up an ambulance
I agree with Anon 6:26 am. I recently had a horrific nose bleed that poured out and would not stop and I still had my spouse drive me to the hospital for treatment. Take care of yourself not at the government or public expense.
ReplyDeleteOh my everyone is picking on my friend Tony Rucker again.
ReplyDeleteI surely hope Dan Damon doesn't refer to him as "Nazi" like again for this as we don't know what ALL the circumstances were for him that he had to call an ambulance to his home.
jim spear
Bernice, I don't chair the Community Advisory Group--I'm just an ordinary member.
ReplyDeleteRobin, I just got the notice of tonight's meeting very late last night--that's why I didn't send out an update with the info. Hope to see you there!
To Anon 6:26
ReplyDeleteLOL. You have to be kidding. I tell ya, you're a real asset to the community. It's a shame nobody knows who you are.
To Anon 7:53
Yet Another ANONYMOUS healthcare specialist. FYI- In Plainfield, patients are responsible for the costs associated for ambulance service. Not the government or the public.
Thanks to the both of you for your advice on how I should handle my personal medical transportation decisions.
Excluding Tony's ambulance use from discussion; one major breakdown in emergency care system has been i the past injudicious use of rescue squad services as well as using the ER as a personal physician for non emergency illness.
ReplyDeleteYou are absolutely correct Tony, it's your right to handle your medical transport any way you see fit but even though you are paying for the ride, you are still tying up the one ambulance that might be needed for a heart attack patient, I am guessing that 6:26 and 7:53 were just trying to say "be a little more courteous even though you don't have to if you so choose.
ReplyDeleteTo 9:58AM - what are you talking about? Tony Rucker had an illness. Thank goodness he was able to wait the 50 minutes without anything serious happening to him. He said the ambulance service was awful.
ReplyDeleteWho is picking on him, and what does Dan Damon have to do with anything?
Geez, Bernice, I thought I said more than that--I know I spoke of JFK's proposal for the Muhlenberg campus.
ReplyDeleteI almost didn't quote you at all for fear of getting something wrong once again. As I recall, your comments were quite lengthy. I don't do verbatim reports (aka transcripts). You are always free to launch or re-launch your own blog to publish your remarks in full.
DeleteSome of you people just don't think. Perhaps Tony didn't have a car available when he became ill? Some people don't have two cars. Myabe his wife wasn't at home and had the car? Or, maybe he was by himself and too ill to drive?
ReplyDeleteI'm sure Tony would have used other transportation than am ambulance, if it was available.
God forbid someone like Tony uses and pays for an ambulance.
It means the Plainfield drunks and drug addicts won't have the ambulance for the free ride to the hospital to dry out, when the police pick them off the streets.
Anon 9:58am
ReplyDeleteMy complaint was over the fact that I had to wait 50 minutes. I realize the delay was not the fault of the ambulance service. That I blame on the city. The medical attention I received was fine and the medical technicians were complete professionals.
To Anon 11:00am
Regarding your comment of the "other" anonymous group members saying I should be more courteous concerning my use of the towns only ambulance...
Who in their right mind would call an ambulance to wait 50 minutes to pay $$$ for a ride if they could drive themselves or be driven??? Not me.
Anyhow,
#1 The issue and the only issue I feel is life-threatening and worthy of discussion regarding the matter is THAT WE ONLY HAVE ONE AMBULANCE for a city over 50,000 people!
Doesn't everyone see that as nothing short of alarming?!?