Friday, March 18, 2016

Planning Board Approves One Case, Mulls Three More

In a marathon session Thursday, the Planning Board heard four applications, approving one in less than 20 minutes, while another involved nearly two hours of testimony with more to follow in April.

The long evening was also new attorney Janine Bauer's first time serving the board, succeeding Michele Donato, who retired after guiding the board since 1985.

Board Chairman Ron Scott Bey changed the order of the agenda to start with the application of South Second Street Redevelopment LLC for a mixed residential and commercial project on a five-acre city-owned site in the West End. Plans call for 90 1-, 2- and 3-bedroom apartments on 1.3 acres at the corner of Grant Avenue and South Second Street and a showroom and warehouse for ABC Roofing on the eastern portion of the lot. The business is already in Plainfield but will be able to expand at the new location.

Engineer John Ferrante displayed a 1956 aerial photo that showed the large building that occupied the site before it was destroyed by fire in the 1980s, However, all the utilities were still there, he said, Slabs covering 75 percent of the site also remain and will be removed, crushed and re-used on the site. Ferrante said a large amount of fill on the site will be used to construct five-foot berms that will be planted with shrubs and trees for green space.

New sidewalks will be constructed around the site, though Ferrante said curbing is in great shape. Board concerns included parking, with one space allotted per unit and no provisions for guests except for on-street parking. The north side of the tract abuts the Raritan Valley Line and no sound-proofing is planned. Scott Bey said firmly no barbed wire, chain link fencing or satellite dishes will be permitted.

Councilwoman Gloria Taylor asked about use of local contractors.

"We don't say 'minority' any more, but I'm saying it," Taylor said.

Scott Bey said use of local contractors is part of the redevelopment agreement.

"I just want to make sure," Taylor said.

(The council approved the redevelopment agreement in November, with a 20 percent goal for minority participation, among other provisions.)

Testimony on the application went on until 9:20 p.m. and will continue on April 7 without further notice.

After a break, the board quickly approved Seven Stars Transport's application to subdivide a Manson Place property and construct a one-family home on the new lot. Architect Brian Taylor showed images of nearby homes and described how he designed the new 4-bedroom, 2-bath home to be compatible with the neighborhood.

Next up was the application of Ministerio Internacional Puerto Del Cielo to convert a Roosevelt Avenue building to a church. Treasurer William Ramos said the church has about 70 members and holds services on Friday, Saturday and Sunday evenings, with most members attending on Saturday. Board members questioned why pews accommodating more than 200 attendees were needed and expressed concern about parking, with only 19 spaces on site and more on a nearby leased lot which is still under construction. Ramos said only a few members drive and two vans transport most of the congregants, but Scott Bey said parking requirements are not based on how people travel, rather on the number of seats in the church.

Taylor asked what the church name was in English, which Planning Director Bill Nierstedt translated as "Door of Heaven." She also asked whether it was a Christian denomination, but Scott Bey said the board "can't get into that."

After hearing more from architect Robert Hernandez and engineer Andrew Wu, Scott Bey said there were 45 items to be cleared up and "make a more successful application." The hearing will continue on April 21.

Last up was night club owner Edison Garcia, who proposed converting the upper floors of the former bank building at 111 East Front Street to apartments.

Based on board comments at a previous meeting, Garcia had modified his plans to give residents a separate entrance so they would not have to mingle with night club guests. He had also improved safety at the rear of the building, but Scott Bey and others still had many remaining concerns. Conversion of second bedrooms to "studies" with no doors might still not prevent them from being used as bedrooms, board member Sean McKenna said. Other unresolved concerns included parking, trash disposal, removal of neon signs from upper windows, use of a common elevator for residents and club-goers and encroachment on city property at the rear.

Board member Horace Baldwin voiced "a degree of unreadiness" to approve the application, which others shared. But as midnight approached, Taylor moved to grant preliminary approval pending resolution of the problems. That set off another round of concern, but finally Baldwin seconded the motion and it passed, 5-2, with Baldwin, Taylor, John Stewart, Siddeeq El-Amin and Anthony Howard saying "yes" and McKenna and Scott Bey saying "no." Garcia now has up to three years to solve all the problems and seek final approval.

--Bernice

10 comments:

  1. It's all about the Benjimans.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Gloria - the south second street development was approved by the council you are a member of and contained the local resident worker set-aside - do you read any of the documents that you are given to vote on? If you can't perform the duties why not just resign?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Because she loves the attention it gives her. Makes her feel important.

    Scott, you need to do your homework on dishes. The owner can restrict where they go on a building or property, but you have no say in the matter other that size and setbacks. I hate the look of them, but you are violating FCC regulations. You can not interfere with communications.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. we can ask the applicant not to use dishes and it their option to comply. We can regulate where they can go. However my request was not in violating of FCC regulations. Our attorney will not let me do so.

      Delete
    2. Not sure its a homework issue - Plainfield (and any other municipality) does not want satellite dishes installed in a generally visible location. My guess is that the conversation related to this development was likely around them not being seen and the concept of managing placement of 90 dishes on a roof and out of site. My guess is the FCC members don't have their dishes mounted to the front of their homes either.

      Delete
  4. If the parking is based on the number of people who attend church, how did the church between West 4th and West Fifth get permission to build. I drive home from church down Fifth and it is a dangerous circus. Lack of parking for that large church is obvious. Did they make special arrangements with Sharon's administration or what. I always wondered, as the drive past that church any time an event is going on requires a great deal of attention and patience. There already were three churches in that vicinity before the newest one. Sorry, I can't remember the name of the church. It is quite large.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Below is the Plainfield ordinance regarding satellite dishes. A huge problem is that satellite installers do not remove competitors dishes. So a home may have several dishes on their roof, but only one in use.

    There shold be an ordinance that requires an unused satellite dish be removed if it is not in use before another can be installed. Again, our landlords should be implementing this if they are good citizens to Plainfield.

    I want Ron to keep on this. Plainfield looks like a satellite farm on some streets. Cannot believe the neighbors don't care.

    SATELLITE DISHES AND ANTENNAS.
    It is the purpose of this section to allow satellite dishes and antennas in accordance with Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulations, but only in locations that will not detract from neighborhood or community appearance or value and provided they are structures accessory to a principal use. Satellite dishes and antennas shall be permitted in any district and require an approved development permit prior to construction. Satellite dishes and antennas are subject to the following regulations:

    A. Satellite dishes and antennas may be located on roofs, but cannot exceed the height limitations in any zone. Satellite dishes in residential zones shall be no larger than three (3) feet in diameter, and satellite dishes in nonresidential zones shall be no larger than six (6) feet in diameter.

    B. All satellite dishes and antennas must comply with FCC regulations, and installers or property owners must provide such proof to the Zoning Officer.

    C. Satellite dishes and antennas shall not be located in a front yard nor be visible from the public right-of-way. They can be located in side and rear yards in compliance with applicable principal building setback requirements. The yard setback refers to the outside dimension of the structure, not the central location.

    D. All satellite dishes and antennas shall be wire mesh and/or painted in earth tone colors in order to reduce their visibility. All satellite dishes and antennas shall be located and screened by fencing or landscaping sufficient to screen then from view to the maximum extent possible that would not impair reception.

    E. No more than one (1) satellite dish/antenna shall be installed on a lot in the residential zones, and no more than two (2) shall be installed on lots in nonresidential zones.

    (MC 2002-29 §17:9-49, December 2, 2002)



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And here's something from the FCC: https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/installing-consumer-owned-antennas-and-satellite-dishes

      Delete
  6. Since when is a white guy not a minority in Plainfield.
    Just sayin'
    And there will be no children right? no impact on schools or resources...

    ReplyDelete